Submitted by RadioFreeAmerika t3_122ilav in singularity
Ok_Faithlessness4197 t1_jdsskog wrote
Reply to comment by 0382815 in Why is maths so hard for LLMs? by RadioFreeAmerika
I absolutely agree, it's multiplication algorithm is very slow, very inefficient, and very different from the way a calculator would handle it. I think it does differ too from how you're considering it, though. It's more than just a really good text predictor. It can use logic and solve novel problems in many unprecedented ways. Here, I would argue, it has a greater-than-superficial understanding of the math algorithm it used to multiply numbers. Can I ask how you'd define an algorithm, and what you'd consider "running a multiplication algorithm"?
Ok_Tip5082 t1_jdtzd17 wrote
Chat GPT is not running the multiplication algorithm. You're being the human in the loop here by having it iterate through every step in the algorithm. You're manually executing a bunch of constant time operations and feeding the input back into itself.
You're basically writing and running code. If this qualified as being able to derive a multiplication algorithm then all CPUs are already sentient.
Ok_Faithlessness4197 t1_jdu12qm wrote
I make no claims about sentience. I will say however that this is far ahead of what was previously achievable by AI standards. In its current form, it has to be allowed enough time to satisfy the mathematical time requirement. In the future, once it's linked with WolframAlpha (A math AI) it will not make the simple mistakes it makes now.
Ok_Tip5082 t1_jdu2er4 wrote
Yeah, pragmatically I don't see any issues with arithmetic or using any math already proved. Imo it's still to be seen if LLMs can do novel thought, but even if not that's still ... what's a word signifying a greater change than revolutionary? Game changing?
I did see some AI coming up with independent models of physics that have no analog yet were able to properly model real physical systems and make valid predictions with a formula whose variables could not all be determined by the researchers, but idk if that was an LLM
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments