Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

TinyBurbz t1_jazi044 wrote

>I was comparing the robot to static cameras. Read the conversation again you dipshit.

So you *intentionally* spoke about the wrong thing in context. Neat.

>I worked for several years. The week is for learning theory about the legal responsibilities.

For whatever chair surfing you did, sure.

What about guards who have to learn Defensive-Evassive driving and carry guns... not quite the same training is it?

You dont know shit compared to them.

Your experience as security doesn't qualify you to speak on these bots.

>You can't even distinguish work from training you absolute moron.

Man you just gotta win this huh.

>I've worked in several places spanning from retail to construction sites and yes cushy offices.

Wow.

>Read the comment dipshit. I mention that you have 0 experience with what the JOB entails. I didn't work at the JOB for a week.

Listen here Paul Blart, the purpose of this coversation was to discuss the viability of the K5 robot; that you are defending.

https://www.cnn.com/2017/07/18/us/security-robot-drown-trnd/index.html

https://abc7news.com/police-say-drunk-man-knocked-down-security-robot-in-mountain-view-k-5-knightscope-robots-named-k5/1915713/

Oh and when its actually needed to call security it tells you to fuck off and plays a song:

https://www.nbcnews.com/tech/tech-news/robocop-park-fight-how-expectations-about-robots-are-clashing-reality-n1059671

Edit:

crickets chirping

1