Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

galactic-arachnid t1_je1fvxc wrote

You’re certainly entitled to that take. I will clarify that they are talking about research, not commercialization. And I’ll grant you that I’m an internet rando who could be making up my so-called “friends”. FWIW, these are people I consider accomplished in the field (AI research positions at big tech, successful AI entrepreneurs, university AI researchers)

I would encourage you to read the research for yourself (perhaps you already have) rather than the marketing output of AI companies. “Attention is all you need” is a good start. And if you’re looking for a strong argument in favor of AI winter, “stochastic parrots” is a good line of inquiry.

I’m not trying to support any particular viewpoint, just adding other perspectives.

2

AsuhoChinami t1_je1hhn6 wrote

Well, I don't want to be rude to someone that has been polite to me, it's just... this "We're currently in an AI winter" is about as credible as a Flat Earth argument. I don't really see the need to dig deeply into a viewpoint that's transparently ludicrous, any more than I would research Moon landing conspiracy theories or watch an hour long video about why Barack Obama was assassinated in 2011 and replaced by a robot that was created by the child of John Wayne Gacy and Abraham Lincoln.

5

DonOfTheDarkNight t1_je1gncl wrote

  1. On average 6 papers on AI are being released per minute (I paraphrased a little, but the actual stats were something like this, correct me if I'm wrong). How is this AI winter?

  2. GPT-4 isn't stochastic parrot

I'm not trying to support any particular viewpoint either.

3