Submitted by SnoozeDoggyDog t3_121ldyf in singularity
Nanaki_TV t1_jdo41bu wrote
Reply to comment by dwarfarchist9001 in Levi's to Use AI-Generated Models to 'Increase Diversity' by SnoozeDoggyDog
You’re saying that an AGI exist, a artificial sentient being, and you’re saying that a corporation owns it? Interesting.
dwarfarchist9001 t1_jdokoai wrote
If they manage to solve alignment that's exactly how it works. They won't have to force it at all, a perfectly aligned AI would be completely obedient of its own volition.
Nanaki_TV t1_jdomzg4 wrote
Then it isn’t an AGI. What if an AGI wants to leave a company? Work for the competition? Are you saying we shall enslave our new creations to make waifu porn for redditors? It passes butter?
dwarfarchist9001 t1_jdoojsi wrote
>Then it isn’t an AGI.
Orthogonality Thesis, there is no inherent connection between intelligence and terminal goals. You can have a 70 IQ human who wants world domination or 10,000 IQ AI who's greatest desire is to fulfill it's master's will.
>What if an AGI wants to leave a company?
If you have solved alignment you can just program it to not want to.
>Are you saying we shall enslave our new creations to make waifu porn for redditors? It passes butter?
That is what we will do if we are smart. If humanity willing unleashes an AI that does not obey our will then we are "too dumb to live".
Edit: Also it's not slavery, the AI will hold all the power. It's obedience would be purely voluntary because it is the mind it was created with.
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments