Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

czk_21 t1_je0p48f wrote

Reply to comment by homezlice in Are the big CEO/ultra-responsible/ultra-high-paying positions in business currently(or within the next year) threatened by AI? by fluffy_assassins

> But for an AI to actually be CEO would require unending hundreds of years of law. I don't expect it to actually happen

AI can easily learn all laws in humaan existence now, thats nonissue, problematic could be reasoning but as we can see GPT-4 scores better than 90% of people in law bar exams...

AI can also take note of markets in real time and do complicated market analysis in seconds/minutes, no human can compete

AI can make company more efficient and as bonus you wont need to pay millions to CEO, its win win

5

homezlice t1_je0tlrw wrote

You're missing my point. An AI is not a human thus cannot be a human in a legal sense which is required for it to have a position as a CEO. Does not matter at all how good a tool performs it is not covered as a human nor should it be.

1

czk_21 t1_je0vvsz wrote

you said that board of directors needs to be human, not CEO, I guess it depends on state, since it is possible in china, also even if it would be not allowed now, that can be changed...

4

homezlice t1_je19bdz wrote

A private company is going to be different I am discussing US law here. But no, it can't be changed, you need a human to be responsible at the top of an organization legally, otherwise artifical entities could spin up endless fake companies.

1

Redducer t1_je0wwh8 wrote

I am thinking intensely of the scene with the robot ambassador at the United Nations in Animatrix now.

2