Submitted by [deleted] t3_11aedho in singularity
turnip_burrito t1_ja01qzg wrote
Reply to comment by Surur in Fading qualia thought experiment and what it implies by [deleted]
What defines the spatial borders of a responsive system?
Surur t1_ja0585j wrote
It that important? The spatial borders are the reach of your control.
turnip_burrito t1_ja0v8bq wrote
But for a human being, the spatial borders are smaller than our reach of control.
Surur t1_ja1iwc1 wrote
Is it really. When we control equipment we seem to adopt it's borders pretty well. We can slip into roles such as a person who controls a country pretty easily.
turnip_burrito t1_ja1mps9 wrote
No, what I mean is you only feel stuff directly touching your nervous system. That's what I mean by spatial borders.
The spatial borders of what a person experiences are their nervous system. Why? And furthermore, what is the equivalent for a light bulb or a piece of carpet?
Surur t1_ja1p6jo wrote
But that is not true. As I explained, we are easily able to expand our spatial borders to include machines we control.
And that question is not reasonable to ask for something which has only two states like a light switch or none like a carpet
turnip_burrito t1_ja1pqh4 wrote
That's not quite what I mean by spatial borders. I don't mean stuff you are causally connected to. I mean something different. I'm not going to go into any more detail though since it's a bit boring.
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments