Comments

You must log in or register to comment.

Iffykindofguy t1_j73yd0e wrote

No one is going to stop you from offending anyone holy shittttttttttttttttttttt get off the cross lol

10

srasmus97 t1_j73yuiw wrote

It must be interesting to lie awake at night and think about how maybe one day you won't be able to harass minorities online.

8

Akimbo333 t1_j74ow1z wrote

I think open source llm will be a thing one day. There are already open source 6B and 20B LLMs

1

Nmanga90 t1_j77zkpf wrote

InstructGPT is GPT-3 fine tuned to follow instructions, and is now the flagship GPT3, and the newest davinci model is instructGPT. ChatGPT is based on instructGPT and further fine tuned for dialog.

1

Nmanga90 t1_j784rkz wrote

What exactly don’t you understand?

Following instructions makes it better because these models are by nature predictive. They don’t understand what you are saying, and are created to predict the next text after the input. By nature, the models basically have an implicit prompt that says “what follows this input:”. This is much less useful than following instructions, because in the real world, there is less money/productivity to be gained by predicting the next text sequence, and more to be gained by completing tasks that you ask it to.

1

Nmanga90 t1_j78du1g wrote

Just out of curiosity, what is your education on the subject? I find it kind of strange or I guess inconsistent that you’re talking about multimodal LLMs and their necessity, but don’t know about OPT, InstructGPT, or why an Instruct model would be better than a predictive model

1

Akimbo333 t1_j78i2ia wrote

I have a limited programming back ground. But I was out of date with GPT models. But for a time I thought that it would be better to have a predictive model that can plan ahead. Atleast that was my mindset.

1