Submitted by CharlisonX t3_10rpxze in singularity
Iffykindofguy t1_j6x0cre wrote
Reply to comment by CertainMiddle2382 in The next Moravec's paradox by CharlisonX
No, you do not need to have an internalized model of the whole world, that's an 80s solution to 80s sci fi paradoxes
CertainMiddle2382 t1_j6xh585 wrote
I don’t get it. DNN latent space is an internalized model of the world, a mapping of its invariants in increasing levels of abstraction.
It is just not called that way…
Iffykindofguy t1_j6xhjgw wrote
A machine build to operate on a construction site does not need an internalized model of the whole world, especially if that machine is able to access new information streams constantly.
CertainMiddle2382 t1_j6xkn6n wrote
A machine? An AI is not a simple machine, it is a machine that strives to have a model of the world and act according to it. It is not a simple excavator.
Iffykindofguy t1_j6xqkgq wrote
Humans are machines. AI's physical body will be a machine. Youre getting lost in the details. My point was simply that a lot of blue collar replacements you seem to think would need entire world simulations for don't require that.
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments