Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

Imaginary_Ad307 t1_j8bggpq wrote

66

Hazzman t1_j8c6v7u wrote

Here's the thing - all of these capabilities already exist. It's just about plugging in the correct variants of technology together. If something like this language model is the user interface of an interaction, something like Wolfram Alpha or a medical database becomes the memory of the system.

Literally plugging in knowledge.

What we SHOULD have access to is the ability for me at home to plug in my blood results and ask the AI "What are some ailments or conditions I am likely to suffer from in the next 15 years. How likely will it be and how can I reduce the likely hood?"

The reason we won't have access to this is 1) It isn't profitable for large corporations who WILL have access to this with YOUR information 2) Insurance. It will raise ethical issues with insurance and preexisting conditions and on that platform, they will deny the public access to these capabilities. Which is of course ass backwards.

17

datsmamail12 t1_j8cv4rs wrote

There's always a new developer that can create a new app based on that. I'm sure someone will create something similar soon.

4

urinal_deuce t1_j8czpo8 wrote

I've learnt a few bits of programming but could never find the plug or socket to connect it all.

1

duffmanhb t1_j8d3a5s wrote

> The reason we won't have access to this is

I think it's more about people don't have a place to create a room dedicated to medical procedures?

0

SilentLennie t1_j8cvgfn wrote

I think I'll just quote:

"we overestimate the impact of technology in the short-term and underestimate the effect in the long run"

10

bigcitydreaming t1_j8fo1ig wrote

Yeah, perhaps, but eventually you'll be at cusp of that massive progression (in relative terms) where it isn't overstated or overestimated.

It might still be years away to reach the level of impact which OP described, but eventually it'll only be months away.

2