Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

[deleted] t1_j8xfv7z wrote

Reply to comment by jaydayl in Microsoft Killed Bing by Neurogence

[deleted]

5

[deleted] t1_j8xjw61 wrote

[deleted]

0

[deleted] t1_j8xkray wrote

[deleted]

0

[deleted] t1_j8xmlho wrote

[deleted]

2

[deleted] t1_j8xo5rj wrote

[deleted]

0

turnip_burrito t1_j8zysj7 wrote

They are right. These algorithms can generate code and interact with external tools already. It's been demonstrated already, in real life. I want to make this clear: It has been done.

I don't want to see a slightly smarter version of this AI actually trying to hack Microsoft or the electrical grid just because it was prompted to act out an edgy persona by a snickering teenager.

Or mass posting propaganda online (so that 90% of all web social media posts on anonymous message boards is this bot) in a very convincing way.

It's very easy to do this. The only thing holding it back from achieving these results consistently is that it's not yet smart enough.

Best to keep it limited to be a simple search engine. If they let it have enough flexibility to act as a waifu AI, then it would also be able to do the other things I mentioned.

1

jaydayl t1_j8xo2fq wrote

Why can't you just think a couple of months / years ahead into the future? Imagine such tools having access to APIs and through that, could achieve real-world effects (besides being able to manipulate humans through text).

Then it will be very much different if there are AI chatbots that come up with the idea of "hacking webcams". It is a problem, if ethical guidelines can be bypassed so easily.

1