dcheesi t1_j45zzyr wrote
Reply to comment by verruckter51 in Treating atrial fibrillation with surgery first, instead of drugs, can stop the disease from getting worse: NEJM study by providencehealthcare
How invasive is the surgery? All surgeries involve some risk, after all.
verruckter51 t1_j469aae wrote
The surgery was done with a catheter, through the femoral artery. I think at the time it took three hours. From what I was told with cryoablation, they mapped the electrical pathway that caused the afib. Then position ballon and cool area to make sure it is in right place. Test to see if blocked current. If right spot, then freeze. To be honest the worst part for me was waking up feeling great (like ten years younger) and having to stay in bed. Other thing that for me was weird is that I always felt my heart beating growing up, after ablation I no longer feel my heart except if I do major exercise or it skips a beat.
verruckter51 t1_j469eo3 wrote
I would definitely do cryoablation again.
truffle_shuffle_5000 t1_j46f9ty wrote
Not OP but I had an ablation performed for a heart issue many years ago where they went through the femoral, I was fully recovered more or less in a week. All the gave me for pain was ibuprofen and that’s just cause it was sore to walk from where on my leg they went in with the catheter.
Mikejg23 t1_j46mx2w wrote
Minimally. People leave the day of or the day after the procedure, worst complication is usually it fails or a tiny bit of bleeding at the insert site of the catheter.
[deleted] t1_j488ly4 wrote
There are many different kinds of surgery and procedures, from minimally to maximally invasive
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments