Comments

You must log in or register to comment.

AutoModerator t1_j2xlfu1 wrote

Vote for Best of r/science 2022!


Welcome to r/science! This is a heavily moderated subreddit in order to keep the discussion on science. However, we recognize that many people want to discuss how they feel the research relates to their own personal lives, so to give people a space to do that, personal anecdotes are allowed as responses to this comment. Any anecdotal comments elsewhere in the discussion will be removed and our normal comment rules apply to all other comments.

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

1

Wagamaga OP t1_j2xlpdj wrote

A new kind of solar panel, developed at the University of Michigan, has achieved 9% efficiency in converting water into hydrogen and oxygen—mimicking a crucial step in natural photosynthesis. Outdoors, it represents a major leap in the technology, nearly 10 times more efficient than solar water-splitting experiments of its kind.

But the biggest benefit is driving down the cost of sustainable hydrogen. This is enabled by shrinking the semiconductor, typically the most expensive part of the device. The team’s self-healing semiconductor withstands concentrated light equivalent to 160 suns.

Currently, humans produce hydrogen from the fossil fuel methane, using a great deal of fossil energy in the process. However, plants harvest hydrogen atoms from water using sunlight. As humanity tries to reduce its carbon emissions, hydrogen is attractive as both a standalone fuel and as a component in sustainable fuels made with recycled carbon dioxide. Likewise, it is needed for many chemical processes, producing fertilizers for instance.

“In the end, we believe that artificial photosynthesis devices will be much more efficient than natural photosynthesis, which will provide a path toward carbon neutrality,” said Zetian Mi, U-M professor of electrical and computer engineering who led the study reported in Nature.

https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-022-05399-1

22

Tearakan t1_j2zgoff wrote

Wasn't the main issue with hydrogen is that it's so damn small it's very difficult to contain and use like we do for oil?

6

[deleted] t1_j30ijoq wrote

Kind of. “Small” is a weird way to put it. The power density of gaseous hydrogen is very poor. It needs to be compressed to be able to transport any reasonable amount for power , which adds danger and reduces the net generation efficiency since power is required to run a compressor.

2

Tearakan t1_j31lj6j wrote

Not really. Physically hydrogen (I am assuming H2) is very small allowing it to leak out of what would be normally solid containers way more often than other fuels.

I wasn't aware if they had fixed this serious issue.

2

mexicoko t1_j33ptyp wrote

Stan Meyer is rolling in his grave RIP

1