Organic-Idiocy t1_j1q9d0i wrote
Reply to comment by Greypilgrem in Logged forest compared with an unlogged forest could be better for climate change. A detailed assessment of vegetation growth, bird and mammal numbers, and energy flows in logged and unlogged forests offers some surprising findings. by Creative_soja
Harm mitigation is not the same as lack of harm.
Educate yourself on simple logic and human communication friend. You can argue that logging is a necessity and better than alternatives while still recognizing that there are many aspects of it which are harmful to the environment.
I eat meat and I can argue that eating chicken is better for the environment than eating beef, but it's still problematic.
>Should rural properties only use helicopters to travel
Rural properties should be largely unsubsidized. The cities largely pay for all those roads, communication services, trash, water, utilities, etc, because some people like the lifestyle. I didn't grow up in a big city. I know that most small town folk are NOT engaged in farming/logging/mining. They can stay there all they want but I'm sick of paying for them to live unsustainably.
Greypilgrem t1_j1qbo3v wrote
My point is that rural roads aren't going anywhere. Therefore, they should be constructed and maintained appropriately. I agree, they are a problem, but we can limit the impact. Also, most rural areas are unincorporated.
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments