CatOfGrey t1_j05luu9 wrote
Reply to comment by Skylark7 in Autopsy-based histopathological characterization of myocarditis after anti-SARS-CoV-2-vaccination by Razariousnefarian
> This isn't misinformation. It's a peer reviewed study looking at fatal myocarditis associated with (but not necessarily caused by) covid vaccination. This sub isn't exactly the place to rally anti-vax support.
You are correct, which is why I focused on emphasizing the key points I did, rather than rely only on the headline, which appears to be a strategy OP uses to spread unnecessary fear about the vaccine.
Anotherherolost t1_j06nuz7 wrote
What should the title have been?
Skylark7 t1_j07kdzj wrote
How is OP using a "strategy" when the headline is the exact title of the journal article? If you take exception to how the authors titled their manuscript that's got nothing to do with OP.
CatOfGrey t1_j07l5l3 wrote
Selecting articles with titles that discuss vaccine side effects, then emphasizing the title instead of the content of the study.
Thus, I quoted specific parts of the study for clarification.
I take issue to this article being misused.
Skylark7 t1_j081cqi wrote
So you are ascribing nefarious motives to only this one post of a journal title and article link and not the remaining thousands of identically formatted posts. It seems you're the one with the agenda.
CatOfGrey t1_j0827hk wrote
The answer to your question is in my main post. Please read my comments before responding.
My agenda is providing quotes from the research to help better distribute information.
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments