Bryan_Waters t1_j056jai wrote
Not sure if OP was involved in conducting the study, but I’m curious why they decided to fix the tissue in 4% neutral buffered formalin and not 10% which is typically standard practice. Underfixation of tissue can lead to false negative staining in IHC, so sort of curious what the rationale was behind that decision.
Skylark7 t1_j05drzm wrote
I've seen standard histology fixation solution referred to as 4% because it's ~4% w/v of formaldehyde. The 10% is v/v.
clayeos t1_j070jzt wrote
I wish I was more smarter like you guys :/
StateOfContusion t1_j07fgse wrote
Not necessarily smarter, just better educated in their fields.
I'm going to hire an electrician to replace my breaker panel. Is he smarter than me? In his field of expertise, 100% he is. Could I learn it if I dedicated 5 years or so? Absolutely.
Just don't ask me to learn and understand quantum mechanics. That's probably outside of my realm.
clayeos t1_j07t2hu wrote
This is very true. Thank you. I appreciate that.
Gwtheyrn t1_j08c437 wrote
Anyone who says they understand quantum mechanics doesn't.
Bakemono30 t1_j08qbjd wrote
I don't understand quantum mechanics
timsterri t1_j092a7c wrote
Unfortunately, it doesn’t work in reverse.
Bakemono30 t1_j092fb9 wrote
Mechanics Quantum understand don't I?
garbage-pale-kid t1_j090pvi wrote
I tend to trust people more when they say "I get the gist of it".
Gwtheyrn t1_j09og8p wrote
Yeah, I understand some concepts about "this is the way things are."in rough, layman's terms, but not the how's and whys.
SolarOrbiter60 t1_j09iy5f wrote
And don’t get me started on String Theory!
nsfbr11 t1_j0960k8 wrote
Just not true. What is true is that quantum mechanics has limits.
[deleted] t1_j09fq02 wrote
[deleted]
zeroxtrange t1_j07xp9v wrote
outside your realm...I get it! Good one!
Baseball_bossman t1_j09111q wrote
“ If you think you understand quantum mechanics, you don’t understand quantum mechanics.” - Richard P. Fleynmen
AspiringChildProdigy t1_j09hyrr wrote
I understand ^(that) quantum mechanics ^(is well outside my wheelhouse).
popejubal t1_j09jebm wrote
I read all of these comments and I’m fairly certain that most of what I read was definitely words. That’s about as far as I got.
Otherwise-Ad4895 t1_j078o5i wrote
Dont trip, it's just jargon. Look up words you don't understand. Repeat forever.
clayeos t1_j07azv7 wrote
Wow thanks man! You’re a nice person.
carybditty t1_j09mou2 wrote
That actually works really well
Skylark7 t1_j0826t3 wrote
It just means we've had the misfortune to be in a lab reeking of formalin. You're not missing out on anything meaningful or fun. :-)
And as other folks have said, it's just jargon. The first person said the heart tissue may not have been preserved in a standard way and that could impact the results. I'm pointing out that there are some less-common ways to describe the chemical used to preserve the tissue. We don't know which is right, whether they did something unusual or used very unusual language.
clayeos t1_j08clz1 wrote
You guys are all so nice! Thank you! Honestly you guys have made my day.
thetransportedman t1_j08sjlk wrote
This is why it’s standard practice to have scientists very similar to your work be the ones reviewing your papers for submission. It’s minutiae you wouldn’t know unless you also do the same type of protocol. You’ll notice it in grad school journal clubs. The best critique are people doing similar things while others who are equally talented can only ask bigger picture questions
sjk4x4 t1_j09efgd wrote
I dated a woman for a while that had a p.h.d. She used it working for a college to translate papers written by faculty into language they could use to teach to students.
SteadmanDillard t1_j09g3z4 wrote
Encyclopedic
Blah-squared t1_j09bzwc wrote
Idiot… it’s not “more smarter”…
It’s ”smarterer”…
popformulas t1_j08yetm wrote
Hey pal, it’s just me and you over here with cheetoh fingers
LilyGreen347 t1_j0989yo wrote
The hardest thing to teach is the desire to learn. Everything else just takes time and patience.
shelleyflower77 t1_j08086w wrote
I was going to say the same until I read the comment below. Thanks.
Bryan_Waters t1_j05ffrq wrote
That’s interesting, is this outside of the US? I’ve never seen it indicated this way in a Pathology report or in a lab SOP, in or out of the US.
chem199 t1_j07gixn wrote
It is German, not sure if that changes anything.
Skylark7 t1_j07guqx wrote
I've seen it in papers from people fixing tissue culture cells or animal tissues. Also I don't think fixation in 4% v/v would even crosslink well enough to section and stain. Their photomicrographs looked pretty typical for FFPE.
ducklingsaver t1_j06pdwh wrote
Most likely an error in methods reporting. I’m guessing some mixup since most labs I know will either use 10% NBF or 4% PFA for human tissue. Either way, the example photos do not appear under fixed.
[deleted] t1_j091n81 wrote
[deleted]
[deleted] t1_j0591pz wrote
[removed]
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments