Comments
[deleted] t1_j1pyxna wrote
[removed]
phyke t1_j1pzv1t wrote
I am very disappointed that they failed to analyse the ambulatory stylings of Mrs. Two-Lumps.
[deleted] t1_j1q0827 wrote
[removed]
[deleted] t1_j1q0nmo wrote
[removed]
N3UROTOXINsRevenge t1_j1q0vjx wrote
More people just need to be walking period. I always park at the back of a lot because there’s no one ever there and I don’t hate walking
[deleted] t1_j1q142i wrote
[removed]
verascity t1_j1q1lgq wrote
Looks like I found my new workout routine!
Acrobatic_Picture605 t1_j1qdn12 wrote
My girlfriend absolutely hates me for this XD
bridgerberdel t1_j1qjob6 wrote
I live in Arizona. During summer I park in the shadiest spot.
[deleted] t1_j1qnbir wrote
[deleted] t1_j1qua5h wrote
[removed]
is0ph t1_j1qx1vp wrote
This is probably Ig Nobel Prize material.
DuncanYoudaho t1_j1rdwb0 wrote
There’s a tradition of silly studies in British medical journals released on Christmas
lorem t1_j1rn790 wrote
Also they failed to analyze the fact that silly walking is very effective when you want to avoid drawing the attention of Arrakis sandworms.
[deleted] t1_j1rp47h wrote
[removed]
SternLecture t1_j1rs81g wrote
I would join a club of silly walkers. The amount of douchebags who like Monty Python I suspect might be very low. ¡!NO CAMEL TOE PRANCING!¡
mycatistakingover t1_j1rxr15 wrote
I mean, aside from not wanting to walk, there is another reason women may want to park closer to the entrance. I was taught to park close to the entrance in a well lit part of the lot to reduce the odds of getting jumped by some creep. Not saying that is the case for your girlfriend but worth considering.
kslusherplantman t1_j1rxrsg wrote
Or to change your gait for identification purposes
Gait analysis is actually a thing, it surprised me when I learned the will use it to help in identification.
Highpersonic t1_j1s0p1j wrote
If you walk without rhythm...you'll never learn.
OddCoping t1_j1s30bm wrote
It is. But is reasonably east to fool by just minor changes, such as wadding tissue paper under your food inside your shoe. More useful methods are based on joint distances and are harder to fool.
kslusherplantman t1_j1s8trr wrote
No, I’d rather just do a silly walk.
Acrobatic_Picture605 t1_j1sgw1t wrote
That’s totally fair. I have never had to think about that sucks that would be the case for women.
underthingy t1_j1sj7z3 wrote
I live in Australia I always try to park in the shadiest spot.
Sudden-Fecal-Outage t1_j1tb5uy wrote
Big Tobacco knew Mr SmokeTooMuch was always a risk…
gulugul t1_j1tfomm wrote
> [...] Adults could achieve 75 minutes of vigorous intensity physical activity per week by walking inefficiently for about 11 min/day. Had an initiative to promote inefficient movement been adopted in the early 1970s, we might now be living among a healthier society. Efforts to promote higher energy—and perhaps more joyful—walking should ensure inclusivity and inefficiency for all.
scoopydoopypoopy t1_j1tppie wrote
I live in the hood so every parking spot is the shadiest spot.
AutoModerator t1_j1pys03 wrote
Welcome to r/science! This is a heavily moderated subreddit in order to keep the discussion on science. However, we recognize that many people want to discuss how they feel the research relates to their own personal lives, so to give people a space to do that, personal anecdotes are allowed as responses to this comment. Any anecdotal comments elsewhere in the discussion will be removed and our normal comment rules apply to all other comments.
I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.