Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

Chetkica t1_iz1kivb wrote

dems have been trying to introduce some microscopic regulation magnitudes below the necessary minimum

but i agree that they are the lesser evil overall

1

VVynn t1_iz20kkd wrote

Why would they even try to introduce sweeping, life altering regulations when they can’t even get the Republicans to agree to the microscopic ones?

3

Chetkica t1_iz2e8zw wrote

It doesn't work that way. Its not an either or. Democrats receive "donations" from fossil fuel corps too, so its not in their interest to propose reforms that arent microscopic. Only the justice dems advocate something slightly more substantial.

0

VVynn t1_iz2f4yx wrote

I guess I just want to see something happen. Every journey begins with a single step.

We’ve made practically zero progress on issues like gun violence and climate change, with the biggest argument being that each individual change won’t completely solve the problem so we shouldn’t do it at all.

3

Chetkica t1_iz2h4mf wrote

the tea is that while voting is a must, otherwise you are self sabotaging, america also needs direct action (protests, green strikes, etc) if you want things to move.

Just voting will not do significant enough changes in any country, politicians must be pushed to do more, more explicitly.

Remember how the civil rights act was passed.

1

dr-freddy-112 t1_iz1m2dm wrote

I mean, I would absolutely LOVE it if we had an actual progressive party in this country that tried to tackle real issues with real solutions, but alas, the establishment (even Dems) won't let that happen.

2

Chetkica t1_iz1xkob wrote

no country has a truly effective electoral system because of capital interests, but i agree that america is so economically right wing that nothing even vaguely progressive achieves broad electoral success, only locally.

You have a problematic two party state organisation, no proportional representation, an electoral college and such.

1