Comments

You must log in or register to comment.

ArchitectofExperienc t1_ixncqfb wrote

A lot of people trashing this paper when it isn't even the first study to show that the representation of outgroups to those holding prejudice is reduced by exposure to honest representations of the outgroup.

Turns out that representation matters.

177

JBHUTT09 t1_ixnok7b wrote

They know it matters. That's why they simultaneously insist it doesn't matter and fight against it. They want to stop outgroup acceptance.

50

Ragnakak t1_ixnspd6 wrote

Who is they? I’m not doubting you, just wondering

7

JBHUTT09 t1_ixnsza6 wrote

I was specifically referring to the people trashing this paper, as mentioned in the comment I replied to.

But, more broadly, anyone who rallies against representation would fall into the same camp.

12

[deleted] t1_ixocia3 wrote

[removed]

−5

JBHUTT09 t1_ixok20a wrote

Are you unfamiliar with language and how words can be used in certain sequences in order to convey meaning? Because you're replying to an incredibly simple comment.

3

FemboyJosieLee t1_ixp2t1q wrote

I feel like a big cause for the people who dig their heels in about these topics were raised with the "I had to do it the hard way, so you can to" and are perpetuating the same thoughts.

"I never got support during X, no one else needs it either" kind of thinking. Not saying it's okay, obviously, but it seems to be a common theme for why there's a few people who are just so adamant against people feeling better about stuff.

16

dpdxguy t1_ixvaps1 wrote

I wish they'd done a longer term follow-up, though. The fact that empathy was maintained for a week doesn't tell us much about long term changes in opinions.

2

MightyWhiteSoddomite t1_ixnon3b wrote

Unfortunately this phenomena is already being harnessed by advertisers and misinformation groups on social media.

1

ArchitectofExperienc t1_ixocjbk wrote

Blame Brad Parscale and Cambridge Analytica. They were the first to really weaponize targeted advertising. And now the whole system is built on toothpicks and doing its best impression of the subprime mortgage market in 2007.

4

_skank_hunt42 t1_ixner5f wrote

There’s a few good channels out there that focus on destigmatizing people with mental illness, disabilities or physical/mental differences. SBSK is one of my favorites for this. The show runner for that channel is very compassionate and does an amazing job.

19

[deleted] t1_ixmzs2p wrote

[removed]

13

[deleted] t1_ixnd2tv wrote

[removed]

20

[deleted] t1_ixndgks wrote

[removed]

−13

[deleted] t1_ixnhd48 wrote

[removed]

14

[deleted] t1_ixnijbv wrote

[removed]

−9

[deleted] t1_ixnj432 wrote

[removed]

7

[deleted] t1_ixnkl2o wrote

[removed]

0

[deleted] t1_ixnkrq5 wrote

[removed]

5

[deleted] t1_ixnlh0s wrote

[removed]

−1

[deleted] t1_ixnmlvl wrote

[removed]

7

[deleted] t1_ixnnbcm wrote

[removed]

0

vida-vida t1_ixobnxo wrote

Recently I've started listening to Soft White Underbelly interviews. It has opened my eyes to so many things. There's a lot of people out there going through things that I can only imagine. I agree, it has made me more compassionate towards homeless folks, whereas before I didn't think much about it.

9

pichael288 t1_ixo1sa0 wrote

Hmmm I wonder how this works with TikTok? I see a fuckton of people on there faking conditions for attention, and people's reactions seem to be the opposite of this paper

8

BakesCakes t1_ixot3r9 wrote

Does that mean people's reaction are good or bad towards the fakers?

2

grosstonsils t1_ixpjv8d wrote

I actually don't think users of tiktok are actually qualified to determine who is faking and not faking their conditions.

2

DJTilapia t1_ixo1q54 wrote

There's some significant editorializing in the title: this study only examined one specific video, about one specific person, with one specific mental illness.

Clarification: OP copied the title from the article; he or she is not the one editorializing. That raises a question: if a study says X and an article says Y, should a poster here on Reddit copy the Y title or try to give it a more accurate title, which would entail interpreting the study?

7

BlissCore t1_ixnblt8 wrote

What is a percentage point in this case?

6

neotericnewt t1_ixnwb7q wrote

Likely based on surveys. This is pretty common for these sort of things. Depression questionnaires can help track severity of depression over time for example. Often in treatment people might not even notice how much progress they've actually made, it's great to take out past questionnaires and show them the actual numbers and tends to give a real boost of positivity afterwards.

7

Andire t1_ixncbst wrote

Most likely based on survey results on perception of mental health issues. So results can be quantified based on the outcomes of those surveys. Example: a person takes a survey and results show they responded favorably to 50% of proposed questions. They watch the video and take another survey with different but similar questions and now respond favorably to 60% of the asked questions, which would then represent a 20% increase in questions that responded to favorably.

1

Greedy_Grimlock t1_ixnb0qi wrote

Yeah nah the problem here is that influencers are usually not making these specific videos out of genuine concern for others. Their main motivation is making money, and they aren't trained in diagnosing or treating these issues, they often provide anecdotal stories about their personal experiences, and they even sometimes (hopefully rarely) make videos about disorders they have not actually been diagnosed with. I think that even if these things combine to reduce a viewer's prejudice, they can easily also combine to provide that viewer a skewed and inaccurate perspective on mental illness that leads to more harm than good.

4

grosstonsils t1_ixph2w0 wrote

Possibly, but I don't think "anecdotal stories about their personal experiences" is necessarily a bad thing when it comes to illnesses, as long as they are not proclaiming they have some sort of cure up their sleeve.

It's almost like a new version of peer support.

2

Reyalla508 t1_ixp62nu wrote

I watch Dr. Lotun on her YouTube channel (she just goes by Shaaba there). Fun to see her Phd these roll by on Reddit!

4

AutoModerator t1_ixmsrkb wrote

Welcome to r/science! This is a heavily moderated subreddit in order to keep the discussion on science. However, we recognize that many people want to discuss how they feel the research relates to their own personal lives, so to give people a space to do that, personal anecdotes are allowed as responses to this comment. Any anecdotal comments elsewhere in the discussion will be removed and our normal comment rules apply to all other comments.

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

1

ErroneousJester t1_ixnhz4r wrote

I'm tired of seeing influencer commercials about mental health. It is affecting my mental health

1

UniversalMomentum t1_ixo1vlx wrote

Does that mean that only watching 17 minutes of radicalized conspiracy theories produces the opposite?

1

corlick t1_ixou8jr wrote

can i get the link to the videos they are referring to?

1

[deleted] t1_ixn75fr wrote

[removed]

0

Sonyguyus t1_ixoh94d wrote

Social media is the largest platform for people with mental illness. Look at all the influencers out there.

0

My3rstAccount t1_ixpgeym wrote

You should feel what happens when you watch RuPaul's Drag Race. Play therapy for adults. And now I know how religions are formed, magic words, and music.

−4

boligenic t1_ixp89wi wrote

Haha mental health. It's like appropriate blood triglycerides or sleep hygiene. Fkn nobody.

−6

UrTruthIsNotMine t1_ixp8c14 wrote

All of them have pink or purple or multi color hair …. Go figure. I’m starting to see a pattern

−7

grosstonsils t1_ixpi1sl wrote

I think you've forgotten what subreddit you're posting on. Do you have a paper on your supposed "pattern", or are you just discriminating against a researcher for fun?

5

Magnum007 t1_ixnj8u5 wrote

Are we talking about people with real, diagnosed disorders or people complaining that their life is hard and self diagnosing?

That is a very important thing to consider.

−8

Lvl20PaladinButters t1_ixnmmqf wrote

But I love lazy people on reddit claiming they can't clean their room because of self diagnosed depression.

−12

grosstonsils t1_ixpii25 wrote

Depression is one of the most diagnosed mental illnesses, so are you sure you're not just assuming people are self-diagnosing? Especially since basic tasks like personal hygiene and chores are a pretty common symptom, too?

3