clashmt t1_iwo7rrs wrote on November 17, 2022 at 2:27 AM

Reply to comment by PMzyox in At CBD:THC ratios most common in medicinal and recreational cannabis products, no evidence found that adding CBD protects against the impairment or subjective effects of THC/cannabis - a randomised double-blind trial with 46 people. by drdrugsandbrains

This is such a baseless comment. I really wish the moderators would moderate comments like this. 46 people is actually a better than expected n for a first pass RCT like this.

PMzyox t1_iwo8hr9 wrote on November 17, 2022 at 2:32 AM

Ok all science based study mathematics aside, if it was really ok to study something on just 46 people and then conclude how all of humanity would react to it, the fda would have been able to clear the Covid vaccines in an afternoon. I understand where you are coming from but the ask from this sample group is unrealistic for the claims

clashmt t1_iwo9j9j wrote on November 17, 2022 at 2:41 AM

>if it was really ok to study something on just 46 people and then conclude how all of humanity would react to it, the fda would have been able to clear the Covid vaccines in an afternoon.

There is essentially no single study which can make conclusions of that magnitude. That's what meta analyses and systematic reviews are for.

Please show me where the authors overstep their conclusions in ways which are unfounded based on the sample size in the RCT.

Also,

>Ok all science based study mathematics aside

Gotta love the presumption that the person you're talking to doesn't have a background in statistics.