Welcome to r/science! This is a heavily moderated subreddit in order to keep the discussion on science. However, we recognize that many people want to discuss how they feel the research relates to their own personal lives, so to give people a space to do that, personal anecdotes are allowed as responses to this comment. Any anecdotal comments elsewhere in the discussion will be removed and our normal comment rules apply to all other comments.

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

I was wondering how a planet could be superconducting; then i realized it was the metal. Nice

[removed]

Glad I wasn’t the only one who at first thought how could an entire planet be super conductive.

I mean, it's mostly made of metal so it wouldn't be impossible..

Was hoping for a brief summary in the title after the bold claim

At its temperature? I think that would warrant further Investigation.

Oh, absolutely. If mercury were a superconductor, we would probably know by now with all the tests we've done. It almost certainly isn't, but a planet sized superconductor would be really interesting

Yeah I hate reading too

[removed]

They did new, more refined theoretical calculations that fit experimental data.

Also mercury glows when you spin it, really probably only scratching the surface with it.

[removed]

It was used in the engines of the vimana, apparently, so we surely have yet to unlock its gravity defying secrets.

What wonders will the adeptus mechanicus gift us with next?? All glory to the emperor!!!

It’s hard to scratch a liquid.

[removed]

I did, but it was boring and dumb so I threw away all the proof.

[removed]

[removed]

It was actually the 111 years later part that I thought was odd until I figured it out - I was like how did they know the planet was a super conductor way back then?

TL;DR - Mercury has long been considered a "conventional superconductor" due to having Cooper pair interactions, etc. but the basic DFT models that usually predict critical-temperature for those kinds of superconductors have trouble making good predictions for Mercury. Now, using more complex modern DFT models, they're able to get a critical-temperature prediction from the theory that matches reality to within 2.5%, as well as pinpoint which aspects of Mercury throw-off the basic stripped-down models.