Hiro-Agonist t1_ivlwxea wrote
Cool study, although this website is abhorrent. The gist of the experiment is proof that a unique state of matter, known as a quantum-spin Hall state is stable at room temperature in a Bismuth Bromide compound.
This has applications not for what we think about as quantum computing, but instead its sister technology Spintronics, or 'electron spin transport electronics.'
The benefit of this tech is while it only does classical computations (the same as our current silicon gate technologies), it is immune to the 'leaky' quantum tunnelling effects that limit the size of our transistors.
Theoretically with spintronics you can produce absurdly tiny processors, even down to the molecular scale. This would be useful for ultra-low power / size applications, such as sensor clouds and nano-robotics.
dreamlike_poo t1_ivmwa36 wrote
I like you- thank you for the links!
FilterNotWorking t1_ivnrlkm wrote
Why can we not use this in some form for quantum computing?
Hiro-Agonist t1_ivnve7p wrote
Because it has nothing to do with entanglement, which is a necessity for non-classical computation.
Instead the use case is isolating a two dimensional 'slice' of electrons on the surface of a 3d substrate.
Simply put your question is like asking why can't you use a lathe to make a bolt of cloth: they are fundamentally incompatibile technologies.
FilterNotWorking t1_ivnvx3v wrote
Understood, I always thought entanglement was a prerequisite for something to be "quantum", like a standard quantum property.
But to go back to your original post, regular electronics have some shielding, how would you shield electronics at a molecular level from the environment and have them running normally?
MaunoSuS t1_ivok5rn wrote
But similar effects can be used to transport quantum states that are then later used or have been used in quantum computing. So it still can be useful in quantum computing.
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments