Submitted by Jealous-Pop-8997 t3_z4g1ab in science
fasthpst t1_iy0apie wrote
Reply to comment by beebeereebozo in Glyphosate associated with lower birth weights by Jealous-Pop-8997
>professional, career toxicologists and epidemiologists at national regulatory agencies around the world
Regulatory agencies and industry share experts. EFSA included. I've read their 2015/17 decision and the references too. If you notice, they discount papers which dont use pure glyphosate. Pure glyphosate is never applied alone. It's a dodge commonly used. They also give a lot of weight to outdated studies and ignore hormonal findings because they were not 'consistent'.
Considering EFSA has a mandate as safety authority, you would think that they would sponsor some lab bench research. Ah well, we will keep doing it with or without them. Now there is about 7 years more worth of publications.
In 2015 glyphosate had only been available to independent researchers for a short while.
beebeereebozo t1_iy0paca wrote
And finally, when reason and evidence is no longer in their favor, antis move the goal posts and turn to conspiracy theories. Same tropes and logical fallacies I have heard repeated for over a decade.
[deleted] t1_iy1y8ea wrote
[removed]
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments