Submitted by BoundariesAreFun t3_y6h4rq in science
footcandlez t1_isponom wrote
Reply to comment by Devil_May_Kare in Hair straightening chemicals associated with higher uterine cancer risk by BoundariesAreFun
Interesting. Does this mean the product labels that say "no parabens" are as helpful as "non-GMO"?
Devil_May_Kare t1_isppeik wrote
I'd say they're probably closer to "certified organic" than "non-GMO" -- some of the things you can use instead of parabens are worse for the consumer's health (e.g., formaldehyde releasing preservatives). The alternative to GMO is typically less food, not worse food.
footcandlez t1_isq3ciu wrote
Your analogy is better thanks!
UrbanDryad t1_ispt8px wrote
Non-GMO is helpful, but only because the most common GMO strains are formulated to have higher levels of pesticides/herbicides dumped on them. So avoiding GMO is a roundabout way to ingest less of those chemicals, and to avoid supporting that farming practice.
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments