Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

1purenoiz t1_is1v4el wrote

Edit: I am not anti nuclear power. In it's short usage on this planet it is demonstrably safer than coal and natural gas. But that doesn't make it problem free.

Still waiting for nuclear power to figure out a long term solution to it's waste problem.

That problem alone can't be ignored and in a lot of people's eyes, outweighs the benefits.

−16

sophons-are-here t1_is2dvxg wrote

The """"problem """ of nuclear waste was solved in the 60s. Nuclear waste isn't some green goo dripping out of barrels, it's small radioactive particles mixed into giant blocks of ceramics or plastics, encased in steel containers. That waste is going nowhere.

The radiation is so diluted and well-contained if you stand right next to any of the storage vats with a Geiger counter you won't see higher than background levels.

10

1purenoiz t1_is568ch wrote

That is not a solution, that is a stop gap.

I can be ok with nuclear power AND be concerned about long term problems.

0

WhatEvil t1_is4avcb wrote

Coal power plants release more radioactive materials into the atmosphere than nuclear, because coal contains trace amounts of Thorium.

2

1purenoiz t1_is55xb4 wrote

I am not anti nuclear . And whataboutism is not intellectually honest.

Nuclear waste is a problem that can't be ignored, a half life for 5000 years means engineers need to figure out how to turn waste into something beneficial or harmless.

1