Having followed life extension science for decades now, I find the science a bit disappointing in some areas, but especially the interpretation of what these experiments mean, the mechanism and human application.

Calorie restriction and different macro nutrient ratios impact processes, but are often misinterpreted as being literal for similar results. An example is from another site where people are taking Rapamicin but ignoring dietary amino acids that activate mTOR.

You also have the CRON people who reduce calorie intake to place their body in often unhealthy states, when they miss that targeted nutrition could be more effective.

The links to autophagy and mitochondrial activity through diet is well established, and when you work backwards to dietary application you find it is not so much about calories but where they are sourced and timing.

There is also confusion with 'healthspan' vs 'lifespan', and I always like the example of a bodybuilding lifestyle that goes against most of these studies but has many elements to boost healthspan with results similar to traditional life extension protocols.

Welcome to r/science! This is a heavily moderated subreddit in order to keep the discussion on science. However, we recognize that many people want to discuss how they feel the research relates to their own personal lives, so to give people a space to do that, personal anecdotes are now allowed as responses to this comment. Any anecdotal comments elsewhere in the discussion will continue to be removed and our normal comment rules still apply to other comments.

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

[removed]

>DR is also a promising hormetin

I'm still not buying hormesis as this powerful force in the body

"Long term restriction" = no food for how long?