Comments
RedSteadEd t1_itn0q4z wrote
>11.5b years for the light to reach us.. Our physical position in space was not here 11.5b years ago. We would have been a lot closer to to wherever this light originated.
Imagine throwing a baseball at somebody, but you're both running backwards away from each other. That's basically what's happening, but on a bigger scale - light is traveling from the galaxy to us, but the space between us is always expanding.
>Does that mean it's taken 11.5b years for that light to finally overtake our position ?
Yes. The image we see when we look at the galaxy left the galaxy 11.5b years ago and carries with it a picture of what the galaxy looked like back then. However, when that light was created 11.5b years ago, the galaxy would have been much closer than 11.5b lightyears. Imagine if I was standing next to you and then traveled instantly to that galaxy. You might think that it would take 11.5b years for you to finally see me (that's how long it would take for the light to reach our original position), but that doesn't factor in how much the space between us would expand during those 11.5b years of travel. The light would have to keep going beyond the 11.5b years to reach you, but I don't know the math, so I can't tell you how much further.
>What have we taken images from literally 180 degrees from that image above to view 11.5b years from the completely opposite direction?
I'm not sure if I understand this... yes, we have pictures facing the opposite way in the universe that also have light that originate from 11.5b years away. Or, are you asking what it would look like if, 11.5b years ago, someone in that galaxy took a picture of us?
>I'm trying to understand at what point we look at ourselves and say there is light from 11.5b years ago.. in every direction
As I understand it, this is part of how we know the universe is expanding - there's light (well, radiation) coming towards us from every direction that's almost as old as the universe. It's called the Cosmic Microwave Background.
AcidShAwk t1_itnc0gz wrote
> I'm not sure if I understand this... yes, we have pictures facing the opposite way in the universe that also have light that originate from 11.5b years away. Or, are you asking what it would look like if, 11.5b years ago, someone in that galaxy took a picture of us?
Take a volume of space, and position a spherical point within that space.. now draw a vector away from the sphere from 6 equal-distant positions on the spheres surface.
Take a picture from each vector origin in the same direction as the vector.
That would give you 6 distinct images from every possible direction away from the sphere.
Do we have images of 11.5b years ago from every single direction away from the earth?
[deleted] t1_itqwr2l wrote
[removed]
pittaxx t1_itu6ly7 wrote
Still no idea what you are talking about.
Humanity had the capability to take pictures for so little time that on the scale of the universe earth is a point that doesn't move.
And the 11.5b years only apply to the objects really far away. How far into the objects pay we see is directly proportional to how far away the object is. The closest star is only 4 light years away, so we see it as it was 4 years ago. (Estimated) 13.3b years for the oldest point of light we found so far.
If you want to think in vectors, you have to add a fourth dimension - time. You draw a vector from earth, but you extend it over time, and for each 1 light-year of length you are turning the galaxy simulation back one year. Only the objects that intersect the tip of the vector are visible to us, nothing else is.
Now repeat that with infinite number of vectors and you have an expanding bubble. Everything on the surface of that bubble is equally old, but since objects don't move faster than light, we only have one snapshot of them.
priceQQ t1_itmfpm2 wrote
Well we can’t say every (just ours). And it takes a very powerful telescope to detect it, so it’s not that much light relative to closer objects.
Wagamaga OP t1_itlrmia wrote
Using the James Webb Space Telescope to look back in time at the early universe, astronomers discovered a surprise: a cluster of galaxies merging together around a rare red quasar within a massive black hole. The findings by Johns Hopkins University and an international team offer an unprecedented opportunity to observe how billions of years ago galaxies coalesced into the modern universe.
"We think something dramatic is about to happen in these systems," said co-author Andrey Vayner, a Johns Hopkins postdoctoral fellow who studies the evolution of galaxies. "The galaxy is at this perfect moment in its lifetime, about to transform and look entirely different in a few billion years."
The work is in press in Astrophysical Journal Letters and available today on the arXiv paper repository.
The James Webb Space Telescope, launched last December by NASA, the European Space Agency, and the Canadian Space Agency, is the largest, most powerful telescope ever sent into space. Its initial general observations were revealed in July, but this quasar imagery is one of just 13 "early look" projects selected through a highly competitive global competition to decide where the telescope is pointed during its first months of operation. https://arxiv.org/abs/2210.10074#
AutoModerator t1_itlrgt8 wrote
Welcome to r/science! This is a heavily moderated subreddit in order to keep the discussion on science. However, we recognize that many people want to discuss how they feel the research relates to their own personal lives, so to give people a space to do that, personal anecdotes are now allowed as responses to this comment. Any anecdotal comments elsewhere in the discussion will continue to be removed and our normal comment rules still apply to other comments.
I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.
AcidShAwk t1_itm6fqa wrote
So I'm trying to understand something. 11.5b years for the light to reach us.. Our physical position in space was not here 11.5b years ago. We would have been a lot closer to to wherever this light originated. Does that mean it's taken 11.5b years for that light to finally overtake our position ? Since we are not travelling at the speed of light. And if so.. What have we taken images from literally 180 degrees from that image above to view 11.5b years from the completely opposite direction? I'm trying to understand at what point we look at ourselves and say there is light from 11.5b years ago.. in every direction