Submitted by BoundariesAreFun t3_yefte7 in science
Comments
DooDooSlinger t1_itzgg2g wrote
I like that the article acknowledges the big limitations of cohort studies, which most nutrition articles dismiss entirely.
It's also interesting that soy seems to be particularly important diet wise, and wonder if it may be related to its phytoestrogen content.
Col_Leslie_Hapablap t1_iu07c5x wrote
That was my thought as well; there is such a (relatively) large amount of estrogen in soy compared to most meats, that perhaps there’s something there.
[deleted] t1_iu09n39 wrote
[removed]
[deleted] t1_iu48cvr wrote
[deleted]
[deleted] t1_ity354h wrote
[removed]
[deleted] t1_ityqpw9 wrote
[removed]
ciras t1_iu0bkr5 wrote
> Dr. Ruiz saw the cohort study design as a disadvantage. He argued that a double-blind study is “really the only way to come up with an observation that may be medically meaningful.”
> Dr. Ruiz added that the study’s small sample increased the possibility of a “huge placebo effect.”
Science news media acknowledging a study's limitations and evidence-based applicability? Hell must've frozen over
[deleted] t1_itxzixn wrote
[removed]
[deleted] t1_ity6wps wrote
[removed]
[deleted] t1_ityqth6 wrote
[removed]
[deleted] t1_ityul1k wrote
[removed]
[deleted] t1_itypdsr wrote
[removed]
[deleted] t1_ityhfl5 wrote
[removed]
AutoModerator t1_itxtkaf wrote
Welcome to r/science! This is a heavily moderated subreddit in order to keep the discussion on science. However, we recognize that many people want to discuss how they feel the research relates to their own personal lives, so to give people a space to do that, personal anecdotes are now allowed as responses to this comment. Any anecdotal comments elsewhere in the discussion will continue to be removed and our normal comment rules still apply to other comments.
I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.
[deleted] t1_itxyrt4 wrote
[removed]
[deleted] t1_itxznja wrote
[removed]
[deleted] t1_ityivwa wrote
[removed]
[deleted] t1_itztyps wrote
[removed]
[deleted] t1_iu037tc wrote
[removed]
[deleted] t1_iu0m64b wrote
[removed]
Meatrition t1_iu17szd wrote
Lead researcher Dr. Neal Barnard, president of the Physicians Committee for Responsible Medicine and adjunct professor at the George Washington University School of Medicine, said in a news release:“We do not fully understand yet why this combination works but it seems that these three elements are key— avoiding animal products, reducing fat, and adding a serving of soybeans. Our results mirror the diets of places in the world, like pre-Westernized Japan and modern-day Yucatán Peninsula, where a low fat, plant-based diet including soybeans is more prevalent and where postmenopausal women experience fewer symptoms.”
​
Interesting. PCRM is a PETA-funded group. I wonder if avoiding animal products was really necessary, and it didn't have more to do with reduction of highly oxidizible vegetable oils.
[deleted] t1_ityvwrk wrote
[removed]
[deleted] t1_ityh1hf wrote
[removed]