Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

SportySaturn t1_it954y6 wrote

Head on over to antiwork and propose a welfare state for homeowners and see if you can feel out whether there are people ignorant enough to feel resentment with this misleading framing.

−13

DoobieBrotherhood t1_it95syy wrote

I have no interest in that sub at all.

I’m just pointing out that it is common to call any financial support from the government for anything “welfare”.

15

anothercynic2112 t1_itburv9 wrote

But it's incredibly disingenuous to deny that welfare is commonly used to imply handouts. Usually by the right but also whenever the left wants to villify a group they disapprove of.

1

DoobieBrotherhood t1_itbwnad wrote

Imagine if we all used words the way the right does, to confuse and confound rather than convey meaning.

1

SportySaturn t1_it97o20 wrote

Providing financial support is different from a reduction in tax obligation. The first is welfare, the second is not. Deciding not to take a chicken leg off your dinner plate is different from cooking you chicken for dinner.

−9

DoobieBrotherhood t1_it9859g wrote

That’s your opinion, but the bottom line is that subsidies of all kinds are called welfare.

10

SportySaturn t1_itaalvd wrote

It's not an opinion that those are qualitatively different sorts of interactions a government is having with persons / entities.

It is my opinion that acknowledging that difference is useful and improves clarity of thinking.

0