Funwithdad22 t1_jcl3qku wrote
Reply to comment by butcher99 in Study of 1.65M COVID Vaccine Doses Finds Rare "Myocarditis" Generally Mild—More Than Half of Patients Didn't Need to be Hospitalized by Voices4Vaccines
I think what they are saying is that the title could have multiple meanings.
1st meaning is accurate to the study. Halfing the patients who had myocarditis 34/77
2nd meaning is Half of the total number of study participate s went to the hospital
not accurate. I don't see how people could believe this. Then again people who don't read the study and are antivaxxers aren't the brightest people so maybe I be do believe it.
I think the title is clear enough and adds vital information.
Voices4Vaccines OP t1_jcoc7h9 wrote
If anyone wants to clarify a better way to write it out, I'm all ears. Newer to this platform and more familiar with Twitter (where editorialization abounds).
My thought was just that most people wouldn't get the core info out of a long JAMA article, since the unique addition of this study as it was circulated on medtwitter, was the low rate of hospitalization. So thought some editorialization was necessary.
butcher99 t1_jcp5tie wrote
It could have multiple meaning if you don't read the article
[deleted] t1_jcrfep7 wrote
[removed]
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments