[deleted] t1_jcicqyw wrote on March 17, 2023 at 1:06 AM

[deleted]

keziahw t1_jcingzx wrote on March 17, 2023 at 2:29 AM

You know it always makes up the citations, right?

reddititty69 t1_jcinrxr wrote on March 17, 2023 at 2:32 AM

That first one is sus; just based on the title.

SerialStateLineXer t1_jcjnke9 wrote on March 17, 2023 at 9:27 AM

I asked Chat GPT about a seminal paper in a niche area (rare genetic disease), and it got the citation right. I think the key is that it has to be a paper that's discussed in the training data.

whatabouteee t1_jcio1pi wrote on March 17, 2023 at 2:34 AM

FYI, chat gpt doesn’t actually work like you think it does. It will write something that looks right, but it just makes it up. Look at the references it is citing for the statements and you will see that it is really hit or miss in terms of facts

matt2001 t1_jciot4r wrote on March 17, 2023 at 2:40 AM

Good catch. Ref 1 is acne... I don't have the chat4, but I've seen YT's that say it is much better. I deleted the comment.

Heroine4Life t1_jcipnbt wrote on March 17, 2023 at 2:47 AM

I replied to your comment before you deleted (on my side). All 3 references were garbage (1 was incorrect and irrelevant, 2 were fake), and most of the statements it made were unsupported.

matt2001 t1_jcitw59 wrote on March 17, 2023 at 3:22 AM

Thanks for the feedback. I hope the next version is accurate, as I do like the format. I have been using it to write code in R, and it has been doing really well. So, this is an eye-opener.