Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

bigboyeTim t1_jbag779 wrote

Reply to comment by PM_ME_GAY_STUF in Researchers team has spent 9 years monitoring gluten-free products to analyse whether they are nutritionally deficient, and found that they are not usually nutritionally equivalent to those that contain gluten, but the quality of the products has increased considerably by giuliomagnifico

On the semantics again, ignoring the obvious context and common meaning of the term. Nobody talking about processed food means a salted egg. It's used to refer to overly - processed foods, such as McDonald's or chicken nuggets, etc.

−1

PM_ME_GAY_STUF t1_jbahfpa wrote

The OP comment is deleted, there is no context to be had. But if you want to avoid getting into semantic arguments, maybe use better semantics that mean what you actually mean? Like, "high sodium", "high fat", "high sugar", "unhealthy", etc. Because "processed" falls apart really quickly.

>"Everyone knows X means Y"

>multiple people think X means both Y and Z

>"No shut up, everyone knows X means Y"

I can make chicken nuggets at home with ground chicken, eggs, and panko, and they have decent macros btw. McDonalds ones aren't that bad either.

−2

mrlolloran t1_jbb6ox3 wrote

Really? No context? What about the comment Bubbagump made where he said “cooking isn’t processing?”

Just because you came in way after the fact doesn’t mean there isn’t sufficient context to at least cast doubt on what you thought they meant.

2