There is an extensive catalogue of services covered by fake interaction resale panels. You can buy any form of interaction from any global or local service,” says one of the study’s authors, Juan Tapiador, a professor in UC3M’s Computer Science Department. Another conclusion reached by the researchers is the level of “customisation” of these services. For example, for many interactions (playing music, watching videos or “likes” on social media) you can choose the geographical origin of the account that will do so and the gender (male or female). “A third interesting finding is the disparity in prices between providers of the same service, which suggests that this is still a developing market where the market value of this service is unknown”, adds Juan Tapiador.

According to the study’s results, the cheapest rates include buying direct traffic to a website, getting “likes” on Instagram or getting views on multimedia platforms. For example, 1000 “likes” on Instagram cost 1.3 euros, while 2 euros can get 1000 views on YouTube or 1000 plays on Spotify. Interestingly, several services are offered for free so customers can check their quality and thus be convinced to invest in different ones. This way, for less than 9 cents you can get 1000 views on TikTok, SoundCloud or Instagram/IGTV. Buying Instagram followers is more expensive: for 4.3 euros you can get 1000. And then there are other more expensive services because they involve some personalisation, such as reviews on Google or TripAdvisor, which range at around 1 euro per text.

As Narseo Vallina-Rodríguez, associate research lecturer at IMDEA Networks and another of the work’s authors, says, “potential consumers of this type of service can be anyone depending on the type of review: from influencers who want to promote their channels on social media to brands trying to promote the visibility of their products”.

This study, recently published in the scientific journal Computers & Security, is part of a wider research project on the ecosystem of services that provide fake activity and identity services on the internet. The aim of this research is to quantify and analyse the evolution of the global market price of services that (re)sell artificial interactions on social media and content distribution platforms, something that has rarely been studied in academic literature, according to the researchers.

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167404822004059?via%3Dihub

Ooh I can finally get those last 38 Twitch followers I need.

Our society has become so fake. We’ve become like lemmings. The blind leading the blind.

It seems to me that we need a meta-study on the negative effects of competition and the permanent hunt for our attention, opinions and resources.

I find it more and more difficult to find positive effects of 'Capitalism', from Scientist outside the openly biased (imho) economic circles. Is market Economy even a Science, or is it a belief-system sprinkled with pretty Math - like Astrology ?

Who proved that all of this crap was good for us ?

I don't know what kind of research is this but this have been the case since ever, in every social media.

Welcome to r/science! This is a heavily moderated subreddit in order to keep the discussion on science. However, we recognize that many people want to discuss how they feel the research relates to their own personal lives, so to give people a space to do that, personal anecdotes are allowed as responses to this comment. Any anecdotal comments elsewhere in the discussion will be removed and our normal comment rules apply to all other comments.

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

[removed]

[removed]

That's really surprising to me. It's incredible how quickly and easily companies have found ways to inflate their social media numbers.

Hmm classic chinese deal. For little you get a lot, but the quality? Meh.

Okay so did anyone do the math to get rich from this yet? Like buy 100000 followers, get Ads/Brand deal, break even after X months, etc..

[removed]

Dumbest “research” ever