Comments

You must log in or register to comment.

dougxiii t1_j9pdgzl wrote

He's a right wee bastard he is.

Am I doing it right?

26

TinFoilHeadphones t1_j9pn29o wrote

After reading the article, I'm left with the feeling that the 2 are correlated, but that the study disn't actually prove causation (even if it was a longitudinal study)

18

theideanator t1_j9qk5o9 wrote

Only when it's the actual 'we' and not the 'royal we'

8

CATHYINCANADA t1_j9wyggq wrote

"...children are known stressors in relationships..." Ain't that the truth!

3

AutoModerator t1_j9pam9f wrote

Welcome to r/science! This is a heavily moderated subreddit in order to keep the discussion on science. However, we recognize that many people want to discuss how they feel the research relates to their own personal lives, so to give people a space to do that, personal anecdotes are allowed as responses to this comment. Any anecdotal comments elsewhere in the discussion will be removed and our normal comment rules apply to all other comments.

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

1

Mirrorflute88 t1_j9qu1fk wrote

Am I the only one who abhors “we talk”? That’s how people talk to literal children.

−11

lukeboardwalker t1_j9rcy65 wrote

I feel like using we on occasion is nice to show you acknowledge and consider your partner as teammates. It is a delicate balance I agree, if overdone it sounds cheesy

14

cryo_burned t1_j9rtvt0 wrote

No, I hate it as well, however the article is taking about people who refer to themself and their spouse as "we" to others, not to the other person in the couple.

Which is when it pisses me off the most, when my wife tells me to do something by saying "We need to do _________"

0