arcosapphire t1_j8u466n wrote
Reply to comment by Sculptasquad in No second law of entanglement manipulation after all | Nature Physics by Memetic1
> Edit - Prove me wrong.
Oh, I could. But I don't want to.
valhalos t1_j8uhd47 wrote
I wish you would/could... Well played.
Sculptasquad t1_j8vaq9j wrote
"I argue like a five year old and think it is a mic-drop."
arcosapphire t1_j8vc3nn wrote
Uh, dude. It was a joke. Because "I don't want to" is along the lines of exercising free will. Get it?
I think we're all well aware that there is no empirical test of free will. There's nothing to argue either way. So I was making a funny, you see?
Eesh.
Sculptasquad t1_j8vcvkk wrote
There is nothing to argue? Great take here on r/science...
arcosapphire t1_j8vdho6 wrote
Do you understand what unfalsifiable means? There is no scientific test for free will.
Acknowledging what is beyond the scope of science is indeed appropriate for r/science. But I'm thinking you're just a troll.
[deleted] t1_j8vefc4 wrote
[removed]
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments