Comments

You must log in or register to comment.

AutoModerator t1_j85bj9z wrote

Welcome to r/science! This is a heavily moderated subreddit in order to keep the discussion on science. However, we recognize that many people want to discuss how they feel the research relates to their own personal lives, so to give people a space to do that, personal anecdotes are allowed as responses to this comment. Any anecdotal comments elsewhere in the discussion will be removed and our normal comment rules apply to all other comments.

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

1

chrisdh79 OP t1_j85bnz0 wrote

From the article: In the study, 112 healthy volunteers between the ages of 18 and 40 took part. Their guilt was measured at the beginning using questionnaires including the state shame and guilt scale (SSGS). This questionnaire asks people whether they feel remorse or bad about something they’ve done. Next, the participants did an exercise intended to make them feel more guilty. The exercise involved writing a story about a time they had treated someone they loved unfairly.

The participants were then divided into three groups. One group received a “deceptive placebo”: a blue pill they were told was a real drug. Specifically, they were told that the pill contained phytopharmacon, a substance designed to reduce the feeling of guilt by making whoever took it feel calmer.

Another group received an “open-label placebo” – the same blue pill, but this group was told it was a placebo. They were told that placebos benefit many people through mind-body self-healing mechanisms.

The third group did not receive any treatment at all. This was the “control” group.

After getting the treatment, the guilty feelings were measured using the same questionnaires to see whether the deceptive placebo or open-label placebo was more effective than no treatment.

47

Fool_Apprentice t1_j85hyee wrote

My guess? Conditioned response.

Take a pill>chemical changes>feel better.

Do that for a few years, and then you can probably remove the middle step to some degree

−2

Th1nk1ngTh1ng t1_j863dx9 wrote

True, but If it's not a double blind study then you can't eliminate the possibility that the respondents aren't reporting the information they think the researchers want to hear. It taints the evidence - biases the sample - especially in human trials.

I've read a number of these "we broke the blinds" placebo studies, and they always find that the people who know they are getting a placebo report extreme results. And, my conclusion is: "of course, they did! They knew that's what the researchers wanted to hear."

4

TootsNYC t1_j86vc7f wrote

I was told of a study done to find what color of paint improved morale and productivity. So they’d come in and repaint the same office frequently. They discovered it wasn’t the paint color. It was the act of painting and spiffing up the office.

5

BlachEye t1_j86vxls wrote

so new article of "WHO COULD BELIVE THIS?!?!?!?!?!?!": saying people "it's fine" works?

1

PM-MeYourSmallTits t1_j86z0si wrote

Well humans are social creatures and despite being more connected than ever, it almost feels like never enough people reach out to those that might be interested in group activities.

I wonder if there's any studies on group dynamics, happiness among friends, and how they feel with "Stranger Engagement"

1

UnApprovedActivities t1_j86zwp1 wrote

Honestly I'd suggest you look into volunteering with assisted living facilities. My uncle was in one for years due to his health concerns and the number of lovely people abandoned there is heartbreaking.

You can definitely find some sharp minds and lonely hearts who will live for your visits.

5

TootsNYC t1_j873j87 wrote

No, it wasn’t the color. The color didn’t matter at all.

It was the presence of the people going to a lot of work to paint the office. Each time they came, it was a shot in the arm.

The changing lights aren’t going to do that.

4

Th1nk1ngTh1ng t1_j873oba wrote

Well, first of all. They are not demonstrating causality with this study because the only scientific method to do that is through multiple confirming double blind randomized controlled trials ("RCT"). That's sort of my point in my previous posts.

If there is a method to test causality of the placebo effect, that's the only way to go about it. (I'm a statistician, btw, that's why I believe this to be the case.)

The placebo in RCTs isn't given to prove the placebo effect exists. It's given to create a control group on the presumption that the placebo effect may exist. It's given to account for the possibility of a placebo effect.

I'm not really sure how to test the causality of the placebo effect but, i would point out that there really isn't any reason to presume that there is a singular cause to the placebo effect. And, asking me to do that in relation to this study is shifting the burden of proof. It's not on me to prove that. It's on the authors of this study to demonstrate that they have.

−1

tornpentacle t1_j875zps wrote

They did have a control group, you know...it is usually best to read the content before criticizing the researchers' basic competency. In fact, assuming their competence is among the subreddit's rules.

2

star_tyger t1_j87c9f6 wrote

Why wouldn't they? A placebo used intentionally can also be effective.

1

feltcute t1_j87c9ms wrote

in theory could i trick myself into this with candy? like one swedish fish a day to keep the guilt away.

i didn’t read more than the headline so

61

Thresh_Keller t1_j87h43e wrote

We just call them jelly beans. No need to get fancy.

11

ddrcrono t1_j87m3rx wrote

Kind of like say if you wash your hands repeatedly.

1

redditor54 t1_j87odrv wrote

Great! Just what we needed, a medication for guilt...

​

Or placebo, why are we trying to cure guilt?

0

NekuraHitokage t1_j87otjw wrote

In which science describes the effects of "religion" and "praying."

2

anttirt t1_j882s0a wrote

Probably not. Having other people (the researchers) approve and validate the process is key.

You know that they know that you're trying to feel less guilty, and since they're "on your side" whether through placebo or not, you're receiving tacit approval.

24

xxScienceLuvva69xx t1_j889bq0 wrote

"hey this pill will make you feel less guilty, do you feel less guilty"

"Sure?”

Great study.

1

seedpod02 t1_j89muaz wrote

Can you decide on the placebo and administer it to yourself, with the same effect as if a doctor or researcher defined and administered the placebo?

I would imagine its like tickling, you can't do it to yourself - as in you can't give yourself a placebo just like you can't tickle yourself

1

Archy99 t1_j8a9ppn wrote

Questionnaire-based studies like this are of low scientific quality and do not actually control for response biases (Including Hawthorne effect) due to impossibility of blinding. It is quite possible the effect is just a change in questionnaire answering behaviour and not an actual reduction in guilt.

A more robust methodology would to objectively measure effect of guilt on real world behaviours.

3

vincec36 t1_j8acdwl wrote

I wonder if going to confession or repenting works like this

1

Blancenshphere t1_j8dno62 wrote

Sounds like how religion works. Just need an authority that everyone agrees on to affirm you are doing your best and you feel better about yourself

1

hiko7819 t1_j8e5fx4 wrote

This is religion in a nutshell.

1