Comments

You must log in or register to comment.

ety3rd OP t1_j20u02y wrote

Unless there's some other element to the story not in this article, I don't see how the Guardians have a case. The Cs are different, one has a lightning bolt, one has a text banner beneath it ... one side's a baseball team in Ohio and the other is a record label/clothing store in Virginia. Not much chance for confusion.

19

RedDirtBiker t1_j217y7b wrote

Hopefully the Calgary Flames don’t see the hats too…

2

thomas8266 t1_j21bauz wrote

waiting for Walgreens to take down the Nationals, or maybe they already tried.

13

rockandpabst89 t1_j21ixjf wrote

The C he uses is the same as the old block C Cleveland used before the name change. It’s still the same ownership of the team I would assume they’ve got that copyrighted pretty strongly and that’s what the suit is over, not the current logo. If that’s not the case Clemson and any other team with a C logo should go class action on the guy because the current logo is completely different

2

c53x12 t1_j21nwdh wrote

Ridiculous with a capital R. Cleveland Baseball Team, maybe do your due diligence before you adopt a new logo that is vaguely similar (an arguable point) to that of a small regional business that's been in business for decades.

5

Charlesinrichmond t1_j21xdhc wrote

That's BS the Richmond Place should do a GoFundMe I would donate

4