Submitted by Locksmith-Pitiful t3_zwilbz in providence
lightningbolt1987 t1_j1zf7zy wrote
Reply to comment by Locksmith-Pitiful in Brett Smiley looks to change / eliminate bicycle lane on South Water Street by Locksmith-Pitiful
“…No one wants to bike the side street, get to Hope, and be vulnerable.”
This is how it works in most places. In Boston you bike down commonwealth avenue and cut over on whichever side street you want to get to Newbury. Same with NYC. You bike on the quiet street and cut over to the shopping street at the relevant block and you barely bike down the shopping street—you cut over and park the bike. This seems to be best practice.
Do you have ANY examples on main shopping streets where parking has been removed for cycle tracks?
Maybe Cambridge Street in Cambridge which is pretty prime but no parking was removed, just a lane of traffic.
Locksmith-Pitiful OP t1_j1zh4be wrote
There's many if you dig down into the case studies or do a bit of google searching. And of course, businesses and wealthy folks in those areas come up with the same shitty arguments.
All I'm saying is, especially in the advent of climate change, we need to aim high, and we need to ensure we aren't being discriminatory based on someone's transportation.
My personal opinion is: Fuck the opposition, they will always be there, this is why we have experts. If your thoughts and ideas aren't grounded in evidence or reason, why should they be considered? I get this is murky water for politicians but for fucks sake, we're falling so behind by considering the ideas of Billy down the fucking street who rolls coal on pedestrians over Dr. Jim who spent his entire life publishing research over this, know what I mean?
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments