Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

SeriousGoose t1_j98arhw wrote

Reply to comment by Sarcofaygo in Saki’s on Weybosset repping Qanon by Sparkleshart

Are you making an argument FOR pedophilia? What the fuck is wrong with you?

42

Sarcofaygo t1_j98bego wrote

>Are you making an argument FOR pedophilia? What the fuck is wrong with you?

No. I'm alluding to how there is a grain of truth to the Q conspiracy. Both major parties have a former president who is a pedo, and both of them got away with it. So I don't get why I need to throw a tantrum if someone believes in Q

−59

SeriousGoose t1_j98d37k wrote

A broken clock is right twice a day.
You think a GRAIN of truth justifies all that other crazy bullshit?

40

Sarcofaygo t1_j98d921 wrote

How is Bill Clinton and Donald Trump both being pedophiles a mere grain of truth?

The 2016 election was between a pedophile and a woman married to a pedophile.

Gee, maybe that made people suspicious! 🤔

Personally I think Q goes a bit too far, but I completely understand how it started.

−46

JuciestDingleBerry t1_j98hvpy wrote

A bit too far? Just a bit? Okay. We won't talk about how many folks in the group are guilty of the thing they accuse everybody else of. They're responsible for domestic terrorism, spreading incredibly dangerous misinformation, and also being anti-trans anti brown and black, and pretty much anti anything straight White male. Let's not downplay them.

29

Sarcofaygo t1_j98i6f0 wrote

> anti brown and black, and pretty much anti anything straight White male.

To be honest the woman in this photo appears to be a POC

As for misinformation, the 2016 election gave then an opening. Trump was a pedophile and Hillary was married to a pedophile. Both Trump himself and Hillarys husband were linked to Epstein. Who is Q obsessed with? Epstein.

−4

JuciestDingleBerry t1_j98ict9 wrote

I can see that and I still stand by what I said. That doesn't make a damn difference

15

Sarcofaygo t1_j98ijl9 wrote

> That doesn't make a damn difference

It doesn't? But you just told me they are all white male supremacists. This is a female POC

1

JuciestDingleBerry t1_j98irzy wrote

I didn't say they were all white males. You don't have to be a white male to be a white supremacist and hate people of color and women. I understand that nuances and subtleties probably complicate things for you. I can explain it to you but I can't understand it for you. Good luck

9

Sarcofaygo t1_j98jbe6 wrote

Clearly they aren't because she isn't white nor is she male. I get that you feel strongly but ironically seem to be reading a little too much into a small piece of evidence and then extrapolating things that can't immediately be proven

−1

JuciestDingleBerry t1_j98jm7f wrote

Nah. This person is brainwashed and you're a contrarian.

6

Sarcofaygo t1_j98kcl3 wrote

Okay

I'd just move on with my life though. I wouldn't be crying to the manager about it.

−1

SeriousGoose t1_j98f3h8 wrote

I don't know, you're the one who chose that word.

10

Sarcofaygo t1_j98fwxu wrote

You yourself admit there is a grain of truth to it. I just don't think it's worthy of complaining to the manager about honestly

By all reports this establishment is going to close anyways so I doubt a complaint would even matter. In this situation I'd just think to myself that I probably voted differently from this person and then move on with my day

1

SeriousGoose t1_j98gd4q wrote

I'm making that argument that a grain of truth doesn't justify believing all the other stuff.
Whether or not I believe it is immaterial.

10

Sarcofaygo t1_j98gntb wrote

I think a lot of people believe ridiculous things. Most major religions are based upon unprovable myths. But I'm not gonna cause a scene if someone is wearing a crucifix necklace.

Personally I wouldn't cause a scene in this situation. I'd just notice it, shrug, and move on with my life. It's not like "confronting" them would change their mind anyways

0