YeahIveDoneThat t1_j6d48yk wrote on January 29, 2023 at 2:27 PM

Reply to comment by aboutsider in Damn, KDKA by montani

Face tattoos, neck tattoos, the hat, I mean, I'm certainly an assumption based on the pictures, but I'd wager a fair bit of money on being spot-on.

Ryanh412 t1_j6foo58 wrote on January 30, 2023 at 12:22 AM

Tons of people have face tattoos, neck tattoos, wear hats and aren’t “wannabe gangsters or gangsters”. I think you were implying something else entirely but I’ll give you the benefit of the doubt.

YeahIveDoneThat t1_j6gnmpv wrote on January 30, 2023 at 4:31 AM

No. I'm not. Anyone who has a face tattoo of a tear drop is a wannabe gangster. Find me a single counter example. You know, we're able to make certain inferences from observable data, right? You can understand that can't you? Sure, do I know with 100% certainty? No. But can I be like 5-sigma certain? Abso-fucking-lutely.

aboutsider t1_j6ho8cw wrote on January 30, 2023 at 12:03 PM

A single counter example-- Kat Von D. She's a famous tattoo artist with a cluster of small stars tattooed on her face.

Another counter example-- I knew a guy who got teardrop tattoos on his face and he's just a dude who likes shitty tattoos. He's an artist and ne'er-do-well but really doesn't have any designs on being a gangster.

You know, you're able to make inferences based on bias too. How do you know that this isn't one of them?

YeahIveDoneThat t1_j6ml0df wrote on January 31, 2023 at 12:00 PM

Ok. You don't think there's any reason he likes the teardrop tattoos? He just "likes" them? Sure, my guy.