Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

MWBartko OP t1_j5praut wrote

You mean without the use eminent domain or do you mean without cost prohibitive bridges and tunnels?

−4

chuckie512 t1_j5prw91 wrote

You'd have to take over a railroad line, which comes with it's own issues (including cost)

6

MWBartko OP t1_j5ps6yq wrote

Not necessarily. There is cost but you could build above, below, or beside.

2

[deleted] t1_j5prd4f wrote

Both

4

MWBartko OP t1_j5prpv5 wrote

Sufficiently worthwhile infrastructure is definitely worth the cost to build it, AKA bridges and tunnels, and unless we are talking about some seriously culturally valuable area eminent domain is reasonable for enhanced infrastructure as well in my opinion.

−4