Comments

You must log in or register to comment.

ldeveraux t1_j2aten2 wrote

Is this first time home buyers at 38? Is this what the current economy has driven us to?

117

RedBullPittsburgh t1_j2cenu6 wrote

I'm 36 so its not that far off. Still waiting to get my first home.

8

Wolfram_And_Hart t1_j2djhif wrote

42, cashed out my 401k for a down payment and then they laid off the entire US based staff.

7

chippersonofYork t1_j2aw19l wrote

That’s the good news

−13

ldeveraux t1_j2aws9v wrote

There's good news here?

10

chippersonofYork t1_j2b65je wrote

Ya people only living at parents home till 38.

−3

surrrah t1_j2bxdng wrote

Idk why living with your parents or family members is frowned upon?

5

showmewhatyougot37 t1_j2byo0e wrote

Because you should be able to own a home near your parents in the richest country in history.

4

surrrah t1_j2djj6p wrote

I mean yes agree. But the whole, living with parent any choice being a bad thing, is strange to me

1

showmewhatyougot37 t1_j2e4lcx wrote

It's not a choice is the issue.

2

surrrah t1_j2e76ss wrote

I get that. But when it IS a choice, people are still put down.

2

showmewhatyougot37 t1_j2eh58p wrote

Because it's not VIEWED as a choice, it's viewed as a poor thing which is frowned upon in the US

4

surrrah t1_j2emvgu wrote

Okay I guess I’m just not explaining well enough what I’m trying to say. Doesn’t matter. Good day

1

Ok-Recording2620 t1_j2eybqb wrote

The default assumption in the US is that if you’re living with parents, it’s because of a life situation (divorce) or because you can’t afford to live on your own. That’s why it’s seen as a culturally bad thing. If someone culturally chooses to live with their parents, it’s probably an immigrant family, it’s just not common here. Living with your family here usually is code for “not thriving”. Not saying it should be like this, but that’s how it is. I’ve never heard someone actually get out down for living with their parents, if anything, people respond positively and say “I wish I could do that” “you’re probably saving so much money” etc.

3

WhyHulud t1_j2ehtjv wrote

Perspective isn't the issue, it's that their parents were buying homes at 18. Boomers suck out so much value for themselves that they drove prices to this point.

2

Smashed_Broccoli t1_j2bq7da wrote

Y’all! Let’s not forget we grew up with boomer parents that said “by 26 I had 3 kids, a home, 2 1/2 dogs, 2 cars and a fully loaded pension!!!!! 38yrs old is the entry point now???? WTF?

36

UsernameChallenged t1_j2brqn6 wrote

2 1/2 dogs

I'm scared of what happened to that dog.

19

trail-coffee t1_j2bvpe1 wrote

Didn’t affect the dog, he just woke up from the surgery and thought “huh, thought I had 4 of those” and went on being happy.

9

DocTarr t1_j2c49sa wrote

It's not first time home buyers

18

Brendinooo t1_j2btlbg wrote

Interesting that Pittsburgh’s sellers were comparatively young too. Aren’t we an older metro?

30

intendedeffect t1_j2bzzsl wrote

I wonder if this is because it often ends up being an estate or institution selling the oldest people’s homes, and they might just not fit into stats like these. And it does seems like there’s still flipping (or attempted flipping) by some young-ish people.

18

Brendinooo t1_j2c6y9f wrote

Interesting ideas, would love to know more about this

3

johnnycuff t1_j2e5psd wrote

Could also be selling to move to a bigger house

3

DERBY_OWNERS_CLUB t1_j2cbb2t wrote

lol this is essentially just a list of average ages in a metro area with housing affordability mixed in since it's not looking at first time home buyers.

Many of the cities with the "youngest" buyers are extremely hot housing cities. Salt Lake, Austin, Denver, Nashville, etc.

8

imouttahereta t1_j2c0vin wrote

I think it's interesting that very expensive areas like NY and LA only average a few years higher than Pittsburgh.

It would be interesting to see how it compares to the past decades, especially since it's hard to get an idea of how it correlates to the age of first-time homebuyers vs. people upgrading their homes.

7

TazerMonkey1419 t1_j2c6awe wrote

Wow, I guess I'm actually a head of the curve for once. First time home owner at 31, I just turned 33.... Yay me?

2

RedBullPittsburgh t1_j2cem14 wrote

Are they using average individual income or average household income? Big difference.

2

glitch83 t1_j2dwwq5 wrote

Also 3rd youngest sellers at 45 lol

2

mikeyHustle t1_j2ehgng wrote

38 is fourth youngest? Jesus. I knew it was bad, but I didn't know it was that bad. (I do not and cannot really own a home tbf)

2

cjc323 t1_j2dh50l wrote

bith of these stats are depressing. People are only moving here becausr its cheap. also 38? our economy is f'ed.

1

JAK3CAL t1_j2c0oli wrote

Bought at 27?28? Now selling at 32 ✌️

−3

zipcad t1_j2dkvbd wrote

38 and making 95k in pittsburgh - what are they heart surgeons?

Edit - you’re missing the livable city meme joke

−5

hooch t1_j2ds877 wrote

IT workers would be my guess

3

icestormsurfing t1_j2dy5nr wrote

I assume that's household income.

3

Ok-Recording2620 t1_j2eysky wrote

Exactly- majority of families are dual income. One person making 50k and the other making 45k is not that high of a salary

3

[deleted] t1_j2b1qoi wrote

[removed]

−13

apaq11 t1_j2bjv5b wrote

There article you link says it in the first two lines: "In the US, first-time homebuyers are, on average, 33 years old. The average age of homebuyers overall is 47." The article is not talking about first time home buyers so 47 is the number you want.

21

dpo466321 t1_j2b3j96 wrote

That's national avg, I think op means the avg of buyer in Pgh

6

[deleted] t1_j2b4cc8 wrote

[removed]

−5

dpo466321 t1_j2b5mpm wrote

¯⁠\⁠⁠(⁠ツ⁠)⁠⁠/⁠¯

Not a topic I care enough about to dig deeper.

5

just_an_ordinary_guy t1_j2bdqc0 wrote

The average can be weighed significantly by the extremes. The average age doesn't have to be number 25 on the list (if we were doing a list of states, unsure of the number of metros in the study). There's probably a bunch of states or metro areas that all have about the same average age of homebuying. So one state with a much lower average brings the overall average down.

3

Anotherburner42069 t1_j2b6447 wrote

I think the discrepancy is the article you linked included the shithole rural areas where you can buy a house for an eight ball and subsidized trip to the dentist.

Edit: toothless dipshits are mad lol

−9

[deleted] t1_j2b7y19 wrote

[removed]

−1

Anotherburner42069 t1_j2bfqw4 wrote

Yeah one looks at places people want to live the other includes shithole rural areas it's different. A discrepancy if you fucking will.

−7