Submitted by MonValley_Dude t3_z3vev1 in pittsburgh
dingurth1 t1_ixobz5g wrote
- What are the democratic party's plans for improving air and water quality? It's a popular topic on this sub and it seems like both parties look the other way in favor of industry interests with a defacto "pay to pollute" model. Action items appreciated.
- The recent Biden administration's infrastructure bill, while great, falls short of what the area is going to need for infrastructure investment. What is the party going to be prioritizing, and is there a plan/focus on getting more resources beyond what's being provided with the new federal push?
MonValley_Dude OP t1_ixog7ms wrote
- Here is a link to the national party's platform on Environmental Justice for the specific national party's position. However, in Pennsylvania, under Tom Wolf there was clearly an interest to greenlight more grants under the DEP for fracking pads and wells. While many Air and Water quality standards are set under the EPA through the Clean Air Act and Clean Water Act, the county health department could likely impose larger fines for violations of the CAA or the CWA. I suspect that this is going to be a major issue during the next county executive election due to our home rule charter and the amount of deference that the County Executive has to fine and regulate polluters. Backing up a bit, on a state level Pennsylvania is slated to enter into the Regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative which would act as a cap and trade to reduce pollution. Unfortunately, Governor Elect - Shapiro has stated that he will review RGGI and its appropriateness. If his administration does consider withdrawing from RGGI, or greatly reduces its impact then I can support a motion at state committee to support remaining in RGGI. As for water quality issues, there is a certain level of preemption from the state government that prevents counties from banning or reducing fracking. One work around to this that I have been supportive of is local municipal ordinances to create zoning setbacks. This was achieved successfully, in part, in East Pittsburgh to prevent the Merrion Oil and Gas well from being developed. When I lived in North Versailles, I ran on banning implementing this model ordinance language, but came up short by 2 votes in 2019. The model ordinance language more or less creates a setback that reduces the ability to frack near residences. For example, this language was adopted by Plum into their SALDO after their original injection well was permitted. Finally on this issue, the Robinson case which was decided by the PA Supreme Court is still being molded, and thus there are still legal questions regarding the extent to which local townships and municipalities are able to 'zone away' fracking. My hope is that with democrats taking back the house that there will be no more corporate welfare to oil and gas companies, but you are right even recently democrats including progressive democrats such as Emily Kinkead and Jessica Benham voted to give $2Billion in subsidies to frack for hydrogen. Green Hydrogen
- As for the Biden Administration's next step, I should note that while my position only effects state party policy, I suspect that the administration is likely to rely on administrative orders because the control of the house is controlled by the republicans. It is conceivable that a second bipartisan bill could be voted on, but I am doubtful that McCarthy would support this.
Also note, because I just graduated from law school - I am not an attorney and I am not providing legal opinions or advice*
Edit: Grammar
dingurth1 t1_ixoi5ys wrote
Thank you for such a detailed answer to #1.
I should have been more clear on #2. What are the locality/state plans to supplement the federal infrastructure spending since it alone isn't enough to meet PA's needs? Where is the federal money going to be prioritized locally?
MonValley_Dude OP t1_ixokt0k wrote
- Happy to provide that info!
- It is likely going to depend on what the general budget looks in Harrisburg as well as the amount of grant funding we are able to take back from the Washington in 2023 and beyond. My concern is that smaller areas in my district such as Wall or Wilmerding are not getting the type of relief that they need. Also, because we have two new congressional leaders representing us, Lee & Deluzio, they may get less resources allocated due to their lack of seniority in Washington. I can honestly say that even though, I cannot write a bill to the general assembly, this has been the biggest issue that I have sought to address because smaller towns like the ones in my district have such a small and shrinking tax base. One good new law that I have seen is Act 152 which was enacted by county council which has created a special fund local townships can apply for to raze blighted buildings. Even then, the pot is fairly small from this Act, as its funding mechanism is from a flat $500 tax onto every sale of real property in the county to raze these blighted buildings. Because my position as a committee member is to support candidates, I am taking a close look at the candidates running for Summer Lee's vacant house seat as well as Austin Davis', and Tony Deluca's as they all are at least in part of the 45th District. As I will want to make sure that the focus is on addressing this issue, making sure that our funding streams stay open, and do this the best ability that we can without having to raise additional local taxes.
dingurth1 t1_ixsicm6 wrote
Maybe if we fined the industries enough to hurt them, we could send that money to the communities ;)
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments