Comments

You must log in or register to comment.

sebileis t1_iu10vc8 wrote

They should have been doing this from the moment Fake Doyle won the Republican primary.

34

segfaultxr7 t1_iu1gxc1 wrote

> The Republican Mike Doyle doesn’t always identify himself as such. While he bills himself as “the right Mike,” his lawn signs don’t identify him by party, and mentions of his affiliation are hard to come by on his website or even in his campaign announcement.

Politicians really should be required to display their party affiliation in all of their advertising.

I got a mailer from Jeremy Shaffer, same shit. Eight paragraphs of boilerplate about bipartisanship, "common sense" solutions, supporting small businesses, etc.

On the other side was his resume, minus the part where he was a leader at an anti-gay Baptist church.

I emailed him to ask why he was too much of a coward to admit that he's a Republican. Unsurprisingly, he was too much of a coward to explain himself.

25

davidearl69 t1_iu1ng78 wrote

I've always thought the opposite. I wish no one would identify by party. At the very least, the government shouldn't be advertising your party affiliation for you on the ballot.

If everyone had to actually know who you were voting for, and not just what team they were on, I think it would do a lot more good than harm.

−8

just_an_ordinary_guy t1_iu1p492 wrote

I can surmise a lot of information about a candidate by knowing what party they belong to. Particularly in this day and age. Having their party affiliation listed is a good thing. Otherwise, Republicans would just always run somebody who comes alphabetically first and win all of the time.

8

brosacea t1_iu1yxgt wrote

The problem with this is that so many political ads have out-of-context quotes and outright lies. If I believed them I'd assume every candidate running for everything was personally trying to murder me (even though sometimes it seems like they are indirectly).

4