Da-OG_karma2000 OP t1_itrcy3o wrote
Update: apparently I have to file both the Complaint and the Notice of Intention to Appear, despite the fact that said Notice does not have a hearing date or time listed on it.
Vast-Support-1466 t1_itrfapk wrote
1.) Landord waited until day 30 thinking you'd not be on the lookout for anything - respond within 20 days. Make sure the court has it, or it all goes poof.
2.) The complaint portion simply wants a restatement of what the issue is - ie., the judgement in your favor. Supplementally, include that documentation.
3.) The judgement still exists. The landlord contesting it and taking it form one court to another changes NOTHING.
Da-OG_karma2000 OP t1_itrhjj3 wrote
I am flummoxed by this, but it appears that Cyclops is the winner of this match. The court clerk just responded with this:
Once the decision is appealed to the Court of Common Pleas it becomes de novo. Which means the case starts over again from the beginning. This is why you would need to file a new complaint.
One thing is certain, the law in Pennsylvania is tailored to the benefit of landlords and landlords only. This has to change. I don't live in PA anymore but someone has to fight for the lowly renters who do.
hiperson134 t1_itsr0fe wrote
The fuck is the point of the first trial if the landlord can just say "nuh uh, do-over!" in response to the ruling?
[deleted] t1_itupmo0 wrote
[deleted]
Beginning-Yak-911 t1_iu1x3xt wrote
The PA magistrate system has no purpose in the modern world
PolyDipsoManiac t1_itrlzc8 wrote
America is not really about making people’s lives better, just making rich people richer. Tenant protections are the former category, sadly
Da-OG_karma2000 OP t1_itrr89q wrote
The tide is starting to change. Check out the NYTimes's recent article about tenants organizing in Kansas City. https://www.nytimes.com/2022/10/15/business/economy/rent-tenant-activism.html?unlocked_article_code=0RIXkjVxfESZM2f68xkSV4gHjfOe-PDOYm5yi1F9d4z27AEE-pfPokQQBGuyXo1-k2QRZP5JtsTOu0AflHVoRpWROagdcajys8Fq5l3TK02Vz6pf8lajg21rtTKWQPxW9zqULJ1R_TN0UGOQpjw_Q57Q1miLadyFI8JHC-didk20eJvNNVSlrZg5W3Uu77CQTMHJ9axSO1LqbppdSrqqLOknHkymXDb0GuUX9ujm_gTgJHYZ_QmAORLxfu4KPiVSfdCHHQhOxnjry1Bdhk9o9ZgdJzDzLD3DC6TPeFge2KIWl787eHGmQah5VPAmmFkb5VZTEkT-QPS6fdxhDvJSiTml20YE0r7i&smid=share-url
Paranoidexboyfriend t1_itt6k8w wrote
I promise you that de novo appeals of magistrates decisions IS a tenant protection, and one of the best there is. This is one of the rare cases where a landlord is using it. The overwhelming majority of the time it is the tenant appealing de novo, which buys them months more time in the property on eviction cases.
Vast-Support-1466 t1_itrzl1q wrote
Okay - lame.
Include it still.
[deleted] t1_iu1wymt wrote
[deleted]
Vast-Support-1466 t1_iu1xqk8 wrote
Yeah, pity you didn't read the subsequent comments. You have a good day, you snarky you.
Beginning-Yak-911 t1_iu1ze46 wrote
Ugh sorry
Vast-Support-1466 t1_iu2qedv wrote
No worries! Be well.
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments