Submitted by PublicCommenter t3_11x56x9 in pittsburgh
Swanhollow t1_jd3ppm9 wrote
Not a pro here, but I think the biggest issue at hand isn't the ratio of the zoning review cost to the overall project cost, but rather the fact that developers (in this case) could invest $250k to get a zoning review, have it denied, get nothing in return, and be out $250k.
Even as an investor/developer with deep pockets, $250k is a lot of money to put forward if one of the outcomes is that you will a.) get denied and b.) lose your $250k.
I think it's safe to say not many people would make that investment.
Now, the reality is, there is a chance it'll get accepted and Walnut Capital (a company with deep pockets) will have an opportunity to build a big, money making development. However, I think you can see how the exorbitant fees, in the future, will limit other, smaller developers from submitting plans. This will then reduce competition, slow down development in Pittsburgh, and only allow the big boys developers to have a seat at the development table.
burritoace t1_jd78360 wrote
If the developers get so far down the road on a project of this size without reviewing it for general compliance with the zoning code then they are incompetent and deserve to lose that money. The city is not going to block projects that are generally compliant, they want the development to occur too. The reviews are about making changes at the margins, ensuring compliance with all city requirements, etc.
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments