Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

CounterSensitive776 t1_jamps8w wrote

Common tactic for big property management outfits that are competing for tenants.

18

gucci_gucci_gu t1_japgidh wrote

Like the big high rises they’re throwing up in the north shore. But zero initiative to update bridges.

−1

CounterSensitive776 t1_japq7bh wrote

Bridges are the city's responsibility, private developers are throwing up the matchstick high rises with overpriced rents.

4

gucci_gucci_gu t1_japrbe8 wrote

We can only handle so much traffic congestion from construction in this city at once. Capitalist projects need to be a last priority. Pittsburgh is blue for a reason. Go to Texas

−3

CounterSensitive776 t1_japztbm wrote

All new residential construction in the city had to block a percentage of apartments off for the affordable housing program, which provides reduced rent based on income. It's a convoluted program and how "affordable" it is is debatable, but it allows Democrats to claim they are doing something about the current housing crisis.

The city also rakes in the permit fees and other associated costs that come with new construction.

I am not by any means advocating for these buildings, just explaining what goes on behind the scenes a little bit.

3