Comments

You must log in or register to comment.

CuriousCanuk t1_iy7uzr9 wrote

Just educating the kiddo's. Central banking is the scam

−8

MaximusJCat t1_iy7xs5y wrote

It also looks fake. The pixels around the letters don’t match the pixelation in the rest of the image.

95

MaximusJCat t1_iy7ypwy wrote

With the knowledge that you probably took this photo then. Be curious to know if this is some form of graffiti? Originally zoomed in because it looked like paper with the text on it, which led to seeing the pixels, so maybe this is something someone pasted on the bus and not something done with the intent of the school.

2

pichael288 t1_iy83win wrote

It could be a sticker that's kind of fucked up. Usually when the letters look like that and the pixelation is not the same sized pixels as the rest of the image, it's a sign of photoshop

5

KyotoGaijin t1_iy8412k wrote

In my capacity as a specialist Protocol 21 AI Control Agent for the secret world government, I'm upset to see someone publicly commenting about internal matters. Am I still typing?

3

scrubjays t1_iy842pl wrote

". . . but it probably paid for this bus."

1

Type31 OP t1_iy84b1s wrote

No idea. I took it whilst driving to work this morning. It looks like they’ve painted over the bit where they wanted to put the writing before applying it. Maybe to make the writing more adhesive?

6

The_Countess t1_iy84ra1 wrote

Government don't need to pay off debt (or write it off), they just need to service it, and wait for inflation and economic growth to make it basically irrelevant.

US world war 2 debt for example was never repaid, but at 285 billion, today, with the US economy reaching 23 trillion, it would represent just 1.2% of the economy.

Government debt isn't like household debt.

283

gumpythegreat t1_iy890nk wrote

And the largest holder of US debt is ... US citizens, investing their money in the single most stable and risk free investment to spend it in the future.

The only concern is when the cost of servicing the debt (ie interest payments) becomes too high that the government struggles to pay for services.

102

ARedWalrus t1_iy8agky wrote

It's almost like the exchange of debt is truly bound to the exchange of material and labor; just like this bus and the future of those it holds 🙃

1

State_Dear t1_iy8buir wrote

Not if you use Photoshop,,, it's easy

8

NotFleagle t1_iy8c4rk wrote

It’s got pluses and minuses. Like everything.

0

QuantumQaos t1_iy8d35x wrote

Factual. What school is this? Time to move, perhaps.

−4

Levesque2019 t1_iy8gmuq wrote

No punctuation; spelling mistake ("Its" about control...), no dot on the "i" in the top line...looks like what was there originally has been wiped, etc, etc. Fake.

5

bitscavenger t1_iy8l7e9 wrote

There is also the fact that this debt is the genesis of our money supply. Paying off or writing off the debt would be the complete unwinding of the current monetary system which no one is in any hurry to do.

20

bustedbuddha t1_iy8n29y wrote

Tell me you don't understand currency without telling me you don't understand currency.

​

edit: anyone else notice that the Troll Farm is in full effect today?

16

colin_powers t1_iy8o9a9 wrote

That's a city bus on a school route. School buses are yellow.

−2

badideas1 t1_iy8oc7s wrote

"It's about control."
"Control of what, exactly?"
"You know, control! Do your research! They're controlling us!"

44

SmuckSlimer t1_iy8p1yp wrote

Some huge chunk of the debt the US government has had was always in bonds issued. People wanted to see their investments grow, so they bought government bonds. This, on the books, is a debt. Last I checked like 80% of the debt was domestic and voluntarily done by the investor each cycle.

The US government debt is not going anywhere. Also, if you balance the budget, the next president will just spend it on whatever they get lobbied to.

8

uasoil123 t1_iy8qo3n wrote

Government debt can never be repaid or it will collapse every currency. Its just a big IOU that just keeps getting passed along

1

BoomZhakaLaka t1_iy8taby wrote

You're making some assumptions about demographics there. Government debt could become a real catastrophe under a shrinking population, which is an imminent problem across the first world.

8

alexh934 t1_iy8v4kn wrote

Someone took a look at

wtfhappenedin1971.com

2

windchaser__ t1_iy8vvqz wrote

It's not really important that the national debt get to zero. It's not even ideal. If, as a president, that's what you're focused on, then you're focused on the wrong things. Debt is a very, very useful tool for growth.

Like, consider the Louisiana Purchase, the purchase of most of the Midwest US and Louisiana from the French. This was funded by debt. Was this a good investment? Abso-fuckin-lutely.

Anyone good with money is going to focus more on the quality of the investment overall, not just whether it is funded by debt or not. The debt just becomes part of the calculation.

A note: debt is a bit more dangerous for government when you're on a hard currency standard, compared to today, when US debt is denominated in US-gov't-issued dollars. But even on a gold standard, that doesn't mean you should always strive for zero debt, any more than a large corporation should.

3

PaxNova t1_iy9214c wrote

Are they looking to write off government debt? Like, all those savings bonds we bought never get paid back? Do they realize government debt is largely to its own citizens?

1

Hattix t1_iy942qi wrote

Well that school doesn't teach economics.

0

Bullmoose39 t1_iy94b05 wrote

The school bus is the perfect place for it. We need our kids to stop thinking that debt, like that which the government runs up, is their obligation. It isn't.

1

Biggie39 t1_iy9anz9 wrote

I always wonder what these people think they are being held back from…

Did the government ‘control’ them into being an unemployed trailer park louse when they would have otherwise been a…. Unemployed mansion louse?

−4

Grunklescorm t1_iy9astg wrote

Strange place to put it, but they ain't wrong.

−1

jk7116 t1_iy9ei44 wrote

Why does the silhouette person have cankles?

1

AsanoSokato t1_iy9ejj1 wrote

Then why did you make an image of it being on the back of a school bus?

1

oh-propagandhi t1_iy9ktjh wrote

Yeah, with a fix that has been known by economists for 20+ years no less. None of it is rocket science. The only real struggle is to make sure that your immigration is varied so as not to create incoming voting blocs and increase stress of acculturalization.

7

Inevitable-Basil-178 t1_iy9kyay wrote

Control as in forcing you to work 40 hours a week for your whole life. Not commenting on what should or shouldn't be, just interpreting the message. If people didn't need to work, they wouldn't, and nothing would get done. A few people with a lot of wealth don't have to work, but depend on the people who do to maintain their lifestyles.

11

oh-propagandhi t1_iy9m0r7 wrote

It's black ink on a white vinyl rectangle. It was placed poorly. You can see the corners. As a graphic designer and photo manipulator none of this looks fake, if it is it was expertly done.

I would assume that this is guerilla messaging done by someone who has access to vinyl printing equipment and upwards of half a brain.

10

oh-propagandhi t1_iy9mfkx wrote

It's tied to a deep satisfaction with one's life, and instead of introspection they say "this must be the fault of outsiders", and still fail to miss very real blame outlets like capitalism run amok, instead having special "insider info" makes them feel special. It's not their fault that they are lonely, poor, fat, etc...

3

Jrapin t1_iy9wemx wrote

There is no struggle for the US gov to service the interest. The US gov is the issuer of all the US dollars, it's nothing more than key strokes to service the interest.

−15

codyish t1_iy9yox6 wrote

But my libertarian friends assure me that their metaphors about people using credit cards and global macroeconomics and government debt are perfectly reasonable and not at all childish oversimplifications.

9

gumpythegreat t1_iya32m7 wrote

If it started to reach the point where the government was printing extra money to service the debt, we would be in trouble. But we're far off, partly because there is also tremendous global demand for US dollars as a reserve currency and de factor international currency across the world

13

Tarkcanis t1_iya4vs2 wrote

The Karl Marx Academy

−1

Concerned_Asuran t1_iya7fg8 wrote

>Government debt isn't like household debt.

Correct.

>Government don't need to pay off debt (or write it off), they just need to service it, and wait for inflation and economic growth to make it basically irrelevant.

Incorrect.

>US world war 2 debt for example was never repaid, but at 285 billion, today, with the US economy reaching 23 trillion, it would represent just 1.2% of the economy.

Ambiguous.

The Deficit Myth by Stephanie Kelton should be required reading in middle and high school. Adults world-wide die of old age still believing in Santa Claus.

−10

Concerned_Asuran t1_iya8976 wrote

No man. He means the US government literally can't owe dollars to anyone. Cities, and States, sure, but not the Fed. It's impossible because the US has monetary sovereignty. Like England, Canada, Japan, etc.

Spain, France and Greece can go completely broke from owing money, for example, because they don't have monetary sovereignty.

Read The Deficit Myth by Stephanie Kelton. It will change your life.

−18

whatdowedo2022 t1_iyaa8q3 wrote

What? We borrow our currency from the fed, which is an external organization that doesn’t answer to the US unless it chooses to. They’re very similar to the national bank, which jackson eliminated in his term in office, which caused the nation to be thrown into a recession bc of the subsequent response by the national bank. What uh, what’re you talking about?

2

Ok-disaster2022 t1_iyaatt2 wrote

The UK government when they freed the slaves in the UK paid for them all with a massive loan. They didn't make the final payment on that debt until 1991.

It's also worth pointing out, government debt can be seen as a positive economic tool. Governments issue bonds that are highly secure but low yield investments.

1

bmoredoc t1_iyab7fp wrote

Stephanie Kelton is a proponent of a theory called MMT that most economists think is false.

Most economists would agree with the commenter above you. Yes you can repay sovereign debt by printing money, but this has consequences for interest rates and debt that can negatively affect the economy and necessitate, for example, large tax increases.

In short, there's no free lunch.

17

The_Countess t1_iyaf5c8 wrote

most of these competing economic theories, like MMT pushed by Kelton here, just look like people arguing over which part of the feedback loop is most important.

They are all important.

If you pick one and push on that too much, then before long it becomes more efficient to push on the other.

5

Jarl_Xar t1_iyahvhd wrote

Looks like its photoshopped on, but that could just be my distrust with this kind of thing.

1

tmax666 t1_iyat3s1 wrote

It’s about poor photoshopping

0

sparkie0501 t1_iyau3p6 wrote

More people need to be made aware of this concept. Could anyone take this statement a little further with some facts and figures, maybe some real world examples?

1

ForgotTheBogusName t1_iyaz8pp wrote

That time may be closer than you think. There is some good research called “The Dollar Milkshake Endgame” that details hyperinflation and our path to it. It was written more than a year ago and we’re walking it now. I’ll see if I can find it and update this post.

Edit: check out the Dollar Milkshake Endgame here. This is part 4.2, but links to the previous research are in there too.

1

uberlux t1_iyazypz wrote

So true though!!!

0

oh-propagandhi t1_iyb4h6x wrote

You don't. Trade is perfectly legal, if the seller wants what you have, and can make up the difference in trade values. You only need to pay the government in your country's currency. You can even use gold and silver as storable mediums of exchange. You won't get a native trade rate, but that's not something you're going to see in a non centralized currency market. Sellers can't trust a non-cenralized currency to hold it's value from sale to exchange and holding a variety of currencies is a pain in the ass.

I'd love to know I'm what ways it is a scam though. We've been through all these challenges and yet some folks read an article online and are suddenly fiat currency experts.

1

RetiredNuts t1_iyb766g wrote

I guess I'm stuck at the definition of government's write-off.

1

BigAlDogg t1_iyb9xvo wrote

Who do we owe? Each other? How about we all just look the other way and start over??

2

Sproutykins t1_iybb0rv wrote

This is what makes me doubt the reality of any conspiracy theories. Have you noticed that, when there are genuine conspiracies which turned out to be actually occurring, the people talking about them were often highly educated, erudite, and articulate? Even the ones who were batshit crazy.

1

shiriunagi t1_iybee99 wrote

There's no world government, and that's not how debt works. I wish all these people spent a little more time studying the bond market before publicizing their ignorance.

1

Xaqaree t1_iyc4wer wrote

Getting real tired of this clowncar argument that pretends economic reality does not matter because it is on the scale of government.

Government debt IS like household debt. This does not end well for you clowns.

1

maxcorrice t1_iycmuor wrote

Test programs for UBI always show different, while yes a significant percentage does stop working, most still do work, enough to keep the world moving especially with how much automation can and is coming into play

2

Sumthin-Sumthin44692 t1_iyd59vc wrote

It is more complex than household debt but it does ultimately operate the same. The rational for high government debt which you mention is the same rational for taking out student loans. It’s a lot of money upfront but over time inflation and increased earnings make it a smart investment, assuming (a) there is no hard cap to total economic growth and (b) society doesn’t totally collapse or fundamentally change.

1

existential_plastic t1_iydnga8 wrote

Okay, but it's really not. If I owe you a $100,000 unsecured debt, that's easily a source of friction between us, especially if I come to you for another $10,000. If a country owes you $100 billion, and (let's say) it gets hit by a hurricane that knocks out its electrical grid, you might actually give away $10 billion so they can fix it, because it's worth doing so in order to collect on the $100 billion debt.

After the Revolutionary War, generation and maintenance of sovereign debt to foreign nations was an explicit goal of the early U.S. government, because it presented parties who might otherwise be neutral (or who might even lean towards British sympathies) with a strong incentive to continue to recognize the new government, instead, lest their accumulated debt become worthless in the face of an American collapse. This played out to some degree in 1812, when there was every reason for other European powers to get involved in the war (especially Spain, who could have easily negotiated a southern front in return for e.g. Florida's return), but instead all of them sat on their hands and, in many cases, continued to buy American goods (to the extent that they could get past the blockades).

2

Concerned_Asuran t1_iye87v0 wrote

>Yes you can repay sovereign debt by printing money

No. You literally don't need to repay sovereign debt because you never borrowed any in the first place. We use "debt" simply because economists got lazy and didn't come up with a different word. But it is completely different from your household transactions.

1