Comments

You must log in or register to comment.

TheForceHucker t1_itrnihk wrote

Julian, I was just reading where it says 'Vancouver'

1

root_b33r t1_itroc2h wrote

Your subjects are interesting the final product is less so

4

bulletproofmanners t1_itrsmkt wrote

Great photo, only thing to make it better is less clothes. Less is more โ€ฆ all the way.

−7

InWeGoNow t1_itruj44 wrote

I'm hoping with my response that this is posted looking for honest opinions.

Likes;. Good clarity and expression in eyes. Good focus throughout. Good light levels. Good skin tone color.

Dislikes: The tattoo is shown but hidden. The face is interesting but shadowed odd. The clothes mixture seems off. With all these being confusing for me, it becomes less artistic and more of something shot while out on a walk.

Bonus points for sharing your work in public. :)

12

johndepp22 t1_itrxfi3 wrote

I get a young Madonna vibe

−2

niconpat t1_its0ezd wrote

Almost sure I've seen this before, or something VERY similar. Definitely the same girl in the same pose in the same landscape.

0

Just_trying444 OP t1_its0sw7 wrote

Replying to niconpat (#227,078)

I had an old account and posted it. I deleted that account b.c I wanted to get off all social media for a while. This is my new account. I have my insta linked in my profile.

1

mgonzo t1_its6spo wrote

Care Bear Stare! Sticks belly out

1

thoth1000 t1_itsexm6 wrote

What's the rationale behind the choice of clothes? I'm just legitimately curious.

3

Large_Big1660 t1_itsr122 wrote

I like it, the face an eyes are sharp. I'd probably prefer a tighter crop though. The photo is in 2 halfs, the face and the chest area. Not for any bosom issue but because that direct sunlight bright red fancy clothing bit is clashing with that beautiful face. Which is the focus, what do I look at? Also, just a minor thing, but her stance looks like she's curving backwards a bit. I think it would be better ifshe had been more straight backed, although that may be a result of the thick fur coat pulling that part of her backwards..

0

Just_trying444 OP t1_itstcxu wrote

Replying to TOVE892 (#230,473)

You are wrong is all I am saying because I meant what I said. Sorry your correction is incorrect. I could care less for sure. I could delete my reddit and not think about it ever in my life. So, yeah, I could care less.

0

TOVE892 t1_itsu3b4 wrote

Replying to Just_trying444 (#230,489)

Then you fundamentally misunderstand the implications of the phrase. To say that you literally "could care less" would mean anything from carrying a miniscule amount, all the way up to caring completely - it would become essentially meaningless. Just accept that you're wrong and stop pretending.

2

TwoCanSee t1_itsuiuo wrote

I feel that there are better ones you took during this shoot.

2

carlos-mari t1_itsv14k wrote

A bit blurry on your left side -probably more f-depth needed - focus is on your right side.

The bustier contrasts nicely with the sky - I like the silhouette of the mountain being at chest level

the "brown furry thing" does not really help much - try the same shot without it?

1

TheMadGeezer t1_itt8x0f wrote

For moment I thought it was younger picture of Jennifer Aniston.

1

karali-green t1_ittj2ji wrote

Wonderful work, stunning photo and I like the red lingerie โ˜บ๏ธ. I also want to be photographed in nature.

1

Alarmed-Diamond-7000 t1_ittpy7e wrote

Oh if I had a dollar every time a dude thought a picture of an attractive thin white woman with a blank expression on her face was art, I would have a lot of dollars

3