Submitted by AUFunmacy t3_10pwt44 in philosophy
ExceptEuropa1 t1_j6ozqbc wrote
Reply to comment by AUFunmacy in The Conscious AI Conundrum: Exploring the Possibility of Artificial Self-Awareness by AUFunmacy
Rebuttals? You're mistaken, my friend. I simply pointed out that your statement was unfair.
Now, your response was again self-congratulatory. I have completed superior degrees than yours, but I haven't yet dropped them here. Look, if it's true that you knew that AI has different approaches, then you simply misspoke. You said something wrong. Period. Own it up and don't get all offended. Gee...
What the hell are you talking about when you say something about evidence or explanation? I corrected you. What else did you want? A book reference? Any book on AI will show how incorrect your statement was. Open one, in a random page, and will you see.
AUFunmacy OP t1_j6pfm5y wrote
šš
Please tell me which degrees you have completed mate, itās not self congratulatory itās providing my credibility to back up the statements I make. What is self congratulatory is you saying āI have completed superior degrees to yoursā.
Show me my mistake? I am so confused what you are all hung up about, where did I claim neural networks were the only trading strategy?
In general, the instigator of the debate is required to present their argument, you have no argument if you provide no evidence. You havenāt showed me what you are talking about, I donāt believe you have āsuperior degrees of eitherā. Get over yourself mate š
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments