Submitted by ADefiniteDescription t3_1097594 in philosophy
pestilenceinspring t1_j3zpu1d wrote
Reply to comment by kreiggers in How philosophy can help with loving the art but hating the artist by ADefiniteDescription
Then specifically take his ends and the others can keep theirs. We can create solutions as we think and go. Problem solving should be ever evolving in my opinion.
Knale t1_j3zsuqq wrote
How exactly do you recommend pirating media so that only one member of an enormous cast and crew is affected?
I'm not sure I understand what you mean.
BlessedBySaintLauren t1_j3ztm9k wrote
I mean if they have an active civil suit against them for payment then the royalties will go to the victims and not the artist.
For example O.J Simpson
pestilenceinspring t1_j3ztmkg wrote
It's just a suggestion, take if you will or won't. I mean hell, some people refuse to watch a show with a "tainted" actor, or those programs aren't aired by many channels or streaming platforms, like the cosby show for example. Some people thought it was unfair because the other actors hadn't done anything triffling and they deserved those royalties. But on the one hand, they have other royalties and roles, or they take on other jobs after acting. I'm not saying it's fair, but its hard to work out royalty payments if viewers won't touch a movie or show or whatever with a ten foot pole.
[deleted] t1_j3zyttg wrote
[deleted]
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments